Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26423918›Full record

ArticleDer Unfallchirurg2015

[Omission of osteoporosis diagnostics and therapy after fractures in the elderly : an avoidable treatment error?].

C Neuerburg, K Heberer, J Heberer

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Der Unfallchirurg, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. [Osteoporosis-risk evaluation and case finding].Orthopadie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2023
    Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

C NeuerburgKlinik für Allgemeine, Unfall-, Hand- und Plastische Chirurgie, Osteologisches Schwerpunktzentrum (DVO), Klinikum der Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Campus Innenstadt, Nußbaumstr. 20, 80336, München, Deutschland. carl.neuerburg@med.uni-muenchen.de.
K HebererRechtsanwaltskanzlei Dr. Heberer & Kollegen, Paul-Hösch-Straße 25a, 81243, München, Deutschland.
J HebererRechtsanwaltskanzlei Dr. Heberer & Kollegen, Paul-Hösch-Straße 25a, 81243, München, Deutschland.
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Through a more consistent diagnostics and treatment of osteoporosis, subsequent fractures and associated complications could be reduced in aged patients. Whereas anticoagulants are now standard in the treatment of fractures of the lower extremities to prevent thromboembolic complications in orthopedic surgery and an omission of anticoagulation can be regarded as medical malpractice, the management of osteoporosis following such fractures is very frequently disregarded. Although guidelines for osteoporosis, such as those from the governing body on osteology (Dachverband Osteologie, DVO) from 2014 are not legally binding as such, the breach of this standard of care can constitute a breach of medical obligation by the physician. The omission of osteoporosis diagnostics and initiation of treatment despite appropriate findings after fractures in aged patients, could represent a diagnostic assessment error and severe malpractice in the legal sense. In this case, evidence of a serious malpractice could be associated with civil, criminal and professional claims which could be linked with relevant legal consequences. Regardless of the legal consequences for omission of osteoporosis management following multiple fractures in aged patients, the management of osteoporosis should be an integral component in the treatment of these patients in the future.

Indexed as

GermanyHumansMalpracticeMedical ErrorsOsteoporosisOsteoporotic FracturesAssociated complicationsFrailty fracturesMedical malpracticeOsteoporosisSecondary fractures

Identifiers

PMID26423918
OpenAlexW2246274156

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.