Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26423750›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2015

Understanding low colorectal cancer screening uptake in South Asian faith communities in England--a qualitative study.

Cecily K Palmer, Mary C Thomas, Lesley M McGregor, Christian von Wagner, Rosalind Raine

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Language as a barrier to colorectal cancer screening in flanders: an ecological study.Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Promoting Colorectal Cancer Screening in South Asian Muslims Living in the USA.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Cecily K PalmerDepartment of Applied Health Research, University College London, 1-19 Torrington Place, London, UK. palmer.ck@gmail.com.
Mary C ThomasDepartment of Applied Health Research, University College London, 1-19 Torrington Place, London, UK. mary.thomas@ucl.ac.uk.
Lesley M McGregorDepartment of Epidemiology and Public Health, Cancer Research UK Health Behaviour Research Centre, University College London, 1-19 Torrington Place, London, UK. l.mcgregor@ucl.ac.uk.
Christian von WagnerDepartment of Epidemiology and Public Health, Cancer Research UK Health Behaviour Research Centre, University College London, 1-19 Torrington Place, London, UK. c.wagner@ucl.ac.uk.
Rosalind RaineDepartment of Applied Health Research, University College London, 1-19 Torrington Place, London, UK. r.raine@ucl.ac.uk.

Funding

Cancer Research UK 14134Department of Health RP-PG-0609-10106
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundColorectal cancer screening uptake within the South Asian population in England is approximately half that of the general population (33 % vs 61 %), and varies by Muslim (31.9 %), Sikh (34.6 %) and Hindu (43.7 %) faith background. This study sought to explore reasons for low uptake of CRC screening in South Asian communities and for the variability of low uptake between three faith communities; and to identify strategies by which uptake might be improved.

methodsWe interviewed 16 'key informants' representing communities from the three largest South Asian faith backgrounds (Islam, Hinduism and Sikhism) in London, England.

resultsReasons for low colorectal cancer screening uptake were overwhelmingly shared across South Asian faith groups. These were: limitations posed by written English; limitations posed by any written language; reliance on younger family members; low awareness of colorectal cancer and screening; and difficulties associated with faeces. Non-written information delivered verbally and interactively within faith or community settings was preferred across faith communities.

conclusionsEfforts to increase accessibility to colorectal cancer screening in South Asian communities should use local language broadcasts on ethnic media and face-to-face approaches within community and faith settings to increase awareness of colorectal cancer and screening, and address challenges posed by written materials.

Indexed as

Early Detection of CancerEthnicityMass ScreeningPatient Acceptance of Health CareReligionAsiaAsian PeopleColorectal NeoplasmsEnglandHinduismHumansIslamLondonQualitative Research

Identifiers

PMID26423750
PMCPMC4589976

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.