Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26423687›Full record

ArticleHealth services research2016

Appropriateness of Prostate Cancer Imaging among Veterans in a Delivery System without Incentives for Overutilization.

Danil V Makarov, Elaine Y C Hu, Dawn Walter, R Scott Braithwaite, Scott Sherman, Heather T Gold, Xiao-Hua Andrew Zhou, Cary P Gross, Steven B Zeliadt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health services research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Systematic review of interventions that improve provider compliance to imaging guidelines for prostate cancer.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2022
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Evidence-Based Cancer Imaging.Korean journal of radiology
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Danil V MakarovVA New York Harbor Healthcare System, New York University, New York, NY.
Elaine Y C HuVA Puget Sound Healthcare System and University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
Dawn WalterVA New York Harbor Healthcare System, New York University, New York, NY.
R Scott BraithwaiteDepartment of Population Health, New York University, New York, NY.
Scott ShermanVA New York Harbor Healthcare System, New York University, New York, NY.
Heather T GoldDepartment of Population Health, New York University, New York, NY.
Xiao-Hua Andrew ZhouVA Puget Sound Healthcare System and University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
Cary P GrossRobert Wood Johnson Clinical Scholars Program and Department of Internal Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT.
Steven B ZeliadtVA Puget Sound Healthcare System and University of Washington, Seattle, WA.

Funding

Optimizing Imaging Use Among Veterans with Prostate CancerIK2HX000851 · VA · VA MEDICAL CENTER · PI MAKAROV, DANIL V. · 2014 to 2015
–
HSRD VA IK2 HX000851
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo determine the frequency of appropriate and inappropriate prostate cancer imaging in an integrated health care system. DATA SOURCES/STUDY

settingVeterans Health Administration Central Cancer Registry linked to VA electronic medical records and Medicare claims (2004-2008). STUDY

designWe performed a retrospective cohort study of VA patients diagnosed with prostate cancer (N = 45,084). Imaging (CT, MRI, bone scan, PET) use was assessed among patients with low-risk disease, for whom guidelines recommend against advanced imaging, and among high-risk patients for whom guidelines recommend it. PRINCIPAL

findingsWe found high rates of inappropriate imaging among men with low-risk prostate cancer (41 percent) and suboptimal rates of appropriate imaging among men with high-risk disease (70 percent). Veterans utilizing Medicare-reimbursed care had higher rates of inappropriate imaging [OR: 1.09 (1.03-1.16)] but not higher rates of appropriate imaging. Veterans treated in middle [OR: 0.51 (0.47-0.56)] and higher [OR: 0.50 (0.46-0.55)] volume medical centers were less likely to undergo inappropriate imaging without compromising appropriate imaging.

conclusionsOur results highlight the overutilization of imaging, even in an integrated health care system without financial incentives encouraging provision of health care services. Paradoxically, imaging remains underutilized among high-risk patients who could potentially benefit from it most.

Indexed as

MotivationVeteransAgedAged, 80 and overHumansMaleMedical OveruseMedicarePractice Guidelines as TopicPractice Patterns, Physicians'Prostatic NeoplasmsRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsSocioeconomic FactorsUnited StatesUnited States Department of Veterans AffairsHealth care organizations and systemssurgeryVA health care system

Identifiers

PMID26423687
PMCPMC4874832

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.