Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26423649›Full record

Trial reportThe lancet. HIV2015

Protease inhibitor monotherapy for long-term management of HIV infection: a randomised, controlled, open-label, non-inferiority trial.

Nicholas I Paton, Wolfgang Stöhr, Alejandro Arenas-Pinto, Martin Fisher, Ian Williams, Margaret Johnson, Chloe Orkin, Fabian Chen, Vincent Lee, Alan Winston and 5 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled TrialPragmatic Clinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The lancet. HIV, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Next generation sequencing of HIV-1 protease in the PIVOT trial of protease inhibitor monotherapy.Journal of clinical virology : the official publication of the Pan American Society for Clinical Virology · 2018
    Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. The Role of L-Selectin in HIV Infection.Frontiers in microbiology · 2021
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Nicholas I PatonMedical Research Council Clinical Trials Unit at University College London, London, UK; Department of Medicine, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore. Electronic address: nick_paton@nuhs.edu.sg.
Wolfgang StöhrMedical Research Council Clinical Trials Unit at University College London, London, UK.
Alejandro Arenas-PintoMedical Research Council Clinical Trials Unit at University College London, London, UK.
Martin FisherBrighton and Sussex University Hospitals NHS Trust, Brighton, UK.
Ian WilliamsResearch Department of Infection and Population Health, University College London, London, UK.
Margaret JohnsonRoyal Free Hospital, London, UK.
Chloe OrkinBarts and the Royal London Hospital NHS Trust, London, UK.
Fabian ChenRoyal Berkshire Hospital, Reading, UK.
Vincent LeeManchester Royal Infirmary, Manchester, UK.
Alan WinstonSt Mary's Hospital, London, UK.
Mark GompelsSouthmead Hospital, Bristol, UK.
Julie FoxGuy's and St Thomas' Hospital, London, UK.
Karen ScottMedical Research Council Clinical Trials Unit at University College London, London, UK.
David T DunnMedical Research Council Clinical Trials Unit at University College London, London, UK.
Protease Inhibitor Monotherapy Versus Ongoing Triple Therapy (PIVOT) Trial Team

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_UU_12023/23
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundStandard-of-care antiretroviral therapy (ART) uses a combination of drugs deemed essential to minimise treatment failure and drug resistance. Protease inhibitors are potent, with a high genetic barrier to resistance, and have potential use as monotherapy after viral load suppression is achieved with combination treatment. We aimed to assess clinical risks and benefits of protease inhibitor monotherapy in long-term clinical use: in particular, the effect on drug resistance and future treatment options.

methodsIn this pragmatic, parallel-group, randomised, controlled, open-label, non-inferiority trial, we enrolled adults (≥18 years of age) positive for HIV attending 43 public sector treatment centres in the UK who had suppressed viral load (<50 copies per mL) for at least 24 weeks on combination ART with no change in the previous 12 weeks and a CD4 count of more than 100 cells per μL. Participants were randomly allocated (1:1) to maintain ongoing triple therapy (OT) or to switch to a strategy of physician-selected ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor monotherapy (PI-mono); we recommended ritonavir (100 mg)-boosted darunavir (800 mg) once daily or ritonavir (100 mg)-boosted lopinavir (400 mg) twice daily, with prompt return to combination treatment if viral load rebounded. All treatments were oral. Randomisation was with permuted blocks of varying size and stratified by centre and baseline ART; we used a computer-generated, sequentially numbered randomisation list. The primary outcome was loss of future drug options, defined as new intermediate-level or high-level resistance to one or more drugs to which the patient's virus was deemed sensitive at trial entry (assessed at 3 years; non-inferiority margin of 10%). We estimated probability of rebound and resistance with Kaplan-Meier analysis. Analyses were by intention to treat. This trial is registered with the International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial Number registry, number ISRCTN04857074.

findingsBetween Nov 4, 2008, and July 28, 2010, we randomly allocated 587 participants to OT (291) or PI-mono (296). At 3 years, one or more future drug options had been lost in two participants (Kaplan-Meier estimate 0·7%) in the OT group and six (2·1%) in the PI-mono group: difference 1·4% (-0·4 to 3·4); non-inferiority shown. 49 (16·8%) participants in the OT group and 65 (22·0%) in the PI-mono group had grade 3 or 4 clinical adverse events (difference 5·1% [95% CI -1·3 to 11·5]; p=0·12); 45 (six treatment related) and 56 (three treatment related) had serious adverse events.

interpretationProtease inhibitor monotherapy, with regular viral load monitoring and prompt reintroduction of combination treatment for rebound, preserved future treatment options and did not change overall clinical outcomes or frequency of toxic effects. Protease inhibitor monotherapy is an acceptable alternative for long-term clinical management of HIV infection.

fundingNational Institute for Health Research.

Indexed as

AdultAgedCD4 Lymphocyte CountDrug Resistance, ViralFemaleHIVHIV InfectionsHIV Protease InhibitorsHumansMaintenance ChemotherapyMaleMiddle AgedTreatment OutcomeUnited KingdomViral LoadYoung AdultHIV Protease Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID26423649
PMCPMC4765553

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.