Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26423575›Full record

ArticleBMC research notes2015

Bayesian network analysis of multi-compartmentalized immune responses in a murine model of sepsis and direct lung injury.

Jean A Nemzek, Andrew P Hodges, Yongqun He

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC research notes, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jean A NemzekUnit for Laboratory Animal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA. jnemzek@umich.edu.
Andrew P HodgesCenter for Computational Medicine and Biology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA. ahodges@sanfordburnham.org.
Yongqun HeUnit for Laboratory Animal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA. yongqunh@med.umich.edu.
University of Michigan–Ann Arbor · US

Funding

Nation Center- Integrative Biomedical Informatics(RMI)U54DA021519 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI ATHEY, BRIAN DAVID · 2005 to 2010
$21.3M
Proj.4: Brain ResponseP01GM067189 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI REMICK, DANIEL G. · 2005 to 2007
$3.8M
Training Program in BioinformaticsT32GM070449 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI ATHEY, BRIAN DAVID, BURMEISTER, MARGIT · 2005 to 2020
$3.6M
NIDA NIH HHS U54 DA021519NIDA NIH HHS U54-DA-021519NIGMS NIH HHS 5 T32 GM070449-04NIGMS NIH HHS GM067189NIGMS NIH HHS P01 GM067189NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM070449
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInflammatory disease processes involve complex and interrelated systems of mediators. Determining the causal relationships among these mediators becomes more complicated when two, concurrent inflammatory conditions occur. In those cases, the outcome may also be dependent upon the timing, severity and compartmentalization of the insults. Unfortunately, standard methods of experimentation and analysis of data sets may investigate a single scenario without uncovering many potential associations among mediators. However, Bayesian network analysis is able to model linear, nonlinear, combinatorial, and stochastic relationships among variables to explore complex inflammatory disease systems. In these studies, we modeled the development of acute lung injury from an indirect insult (sepsis induced by cecal ligation and puncture) complicated by a direct lung insult (aspiration). To replicate multiple clinical situations, the aspiration injury was delivered at different severities and at different time intervals relative to the septic insult. For each scenario, we measured numerous inflammatory cell types and cytokines in samples from the local compartments (peritoneal and bronchoalveolar lavage fluids) and the systemic compartment (plasma). We then analyzed these data by Bayesian networks and standard methods.

resultsStandard data analysis demonstrated that the lung injury was actually reduced when two insults were involved as compared to one lung injury alone. Bayesian network analysis determined that both the severity of lung insult and presence of sepsis influenced neutrophil recruitment and the amount of injury to the lung. However, the levels of chemoattractant cytokines responsible for neutrophil recruitment were more strongly linked to the timing and severity of the lung insult compared to the presence of sepsis. This suggests that something other than sepsis-driven exacerbation of chemokine levels was influencing the lung injury, contrary to previous theories.

conclusionsTo our knowledge, these studies are the first to use Bayesian networks together with experimental studies to examine the pathogenesis of sepsis-associated lung injury. Compared to standard statistical analysis and inference, these analyses elucidated more intricate relationships among the mediators, immune cells and insult-related variables (timing, compartmentalization and severity) that cause lung injury. Bayesian networks are an effective tool for evaluating complex models of inflammation.

Indexed as

Immunity, InnateModels, ImmunologicalAcute Lung InjuryAnimalsBayes TheoremBronchoalveolar Lavage FluidCecumCytokinesDisease Models, AnimalEosinophilsFemaleInflammationLigationLungLymphocytesMiceCytokines

Identifiers

PMID26423575
PMCPMC4589912
OpenAlexW2110237911

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.