Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26423466›Full record

ArticleAnnals of gastroenterology

Survey of anal sphincter dysfunction using anal manometry in patients with fecal incontinence: a possible guide to therapy.

Rohan Mandaliya, Anthony J DiMarino, Stephanie Moleski, Satish Rattan, Sidney Cohen

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of gastroenterology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. BDNF rescues aging-associated internal anal sphincter dysfunction.American journal of physiology. Gastrointestinal and liver physiology · 2021
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Rohan MandaliyaDivision of Internal Medicine, Abington Memorial Hospital (Rohan Mandaliya), PA, USA.
Anthony J DiMarinoDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital (Anthony J. DiMarino, Stephanie Moleski, Satish Rattan, Sidney Cohen), PA, USA.
Stephanie MoleskiDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital (Anthony J. DiMarino, Stephanie Moleski, Satish Rattan, Sidney Cohen), PA, USA.
Satish RattanDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital (Anthony J. DiMarino, Stephanie Moleski, Satish Rattan, Sidney Cohen), PA, USA.
Sidney CohenDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital (Anthony J. DiMarino, Stephanie Moleski, Satish Rattan, Sidney Cohen), PA, USA.
Thomas Jefferson University Hospital · USAbington Memorial Hospital · US

Funding

NEUROHUMORAL CONTROL OF INTERNAL ANAL SPINCHTERR01DK035385 · NIDDK · THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY · PI RATTAN, SATISH · 1986 to 2020
$7.8M
NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK035385
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite the surge of new medical and surgical approaches to treat fecal incontinence, the types of sphincter abnormalities in patients with incontinence have not been well characterized. We aimed to categorize anal sphincter dysfunction using anorectal manometry in patients with fecal incontinence as a potential guide for improved treatment.

methodsA retrospective review of 162 consecutive patients with fecal incontinence referred for anorectal manometry was performed. Resting anal pressure and maximal squeeze pressure were considered as measures of internal anal sphincter and external anal sphincter function respectively.

resultsMean age of the patients was 63 years (13-89); females (81.5%) and males (18.5%). 74% of the patients had sphincter dysfunction on anorectal manometry. Internal anal sphincter dysfunction was present in 62% patients vs. external anal sphincter dysfunction present in 44% patients. 80% females had abnormal manometry vs. 44% in males (P<0.0001). Internal anal sphincter dysfunction was present in 68% females vs. 37% in males (P=0.0026).

conclusionsOverall, abnormal anorectal manometry studies revealed that internal anal sphincter dysfunction is the most common finding, alone or in combination with external anal sphincter dysfunction. We suggest that anorectal manometry may be important to delineate anal sphincter function prior to using newer therapeutic mechanical devices. Future studies using pharmacological agents to increase internal anal sphincter tone may be of clinical importance. Finally, the classification of fecal incontinence based on the type of sphincter dysfunction may be an improved guide in the selection of newer agents in treating fecal incontinence.

Indexed as

anorectal manometryFecal incontinenceinternal anal sphincter

Identifiers

PMID26423466
PMCPMC4585394
OpenAlexW2105084944

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.