ReviewDer Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen2015
[Management of complications in endoscopic interventions of the upper gastrointestinal tract].
Review in Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Endoscopic procedures are frequently performed interventions in the clinical routine. Whereas endoscopy was initially regarded as being a secondary diagnostic tool, over the last decades endoscopic procedures have now become an integral part of various treatment strategies. The appeal of these methods is without any doubt the minimally invasive approach in contrast to open surgery. Endoscopic interventions per se necessitate representative technical equipment and the various components are continually being refined. Considering the complexity of the method, profound skills in endoscopic diagnostic procedures and therapeutic interventions are essential prerequisites for adequate procedural quality and patient safety. Endoscopic examinations are in fact invasive interventions in the same way as surgical procedures and are associated with a certain risk of potential complications. The awareness about potential complications and their respective risk factors is of crucial importance for both the patient and the physician. Complications may harm patients and may lead to increased mortality rates; therefore, it is not only important to be aware of them but also to have an efficient management strategy in order to minimize the damage. Recognition and consistent actions are the basic pillars of correct complication management. These aspects are addressed in this article.
Indexed as
Identifiers
26423397What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.