Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26423049›Full record

ArticleHuman resources for health2015

A qualitative assessment of health extension workers' relationships with the community and health sector in Ethiopia: opportunities for enhancing maternal health performance.

Maryse C Kok, Aschenaki Z Kea, Daniel G Datiko, Jacqueline E W Broerse, Marjolein Dieleman, Miriam Taegtmeyer, Olivia Tulloch

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human resources for health, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 96 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
96citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

96 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Community Health Worker programmes' integration into national health systems: Scoping review.African journal of primary health care & family medicine · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

36 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Maryse C KokRoyal Tropical Institute, P.O. Box 95001, 1090 HA, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Maryse.kok@kit.nl.
Aschenaki Z KeaREACH Ethiopia, P.O. Box 303, Hawassa, Ethiopia. aschenakizer@yahoo.com.
Daniel G DatikoREACH Ethiopia, P.O. Box 303, Hawassa, Ethiopia. danieljohn42@yahoo.com.
Jacqueline E W BroerseVU University Amsterdam, Athena Institute for Research on Innovation and Communication in Health and Life Sciences, De Boelelaan 1081, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. j.e.w.broerse@vu.nl.
Marjolein DielemanRoyal Tropical Institute, P.O. Box 95001, 1090 HA, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. m.dieleman@kit.nl.
Miriam TaegtmeyerDepartment of International Public Health, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Pembroke Place, Liverpool, L3 5QA, UK. Miriam.Taegtmeyer@lstmed.ac.uk.
Olivia TullochDepartment of International Public Health, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Pembroke Place, Liverpool, L3 5QA, UK. o.tulloch@odi.org.uk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHealth extension workers (HEWs) in Ethiopia have a unique position, connecting communities to the health sector. This intermediary position requires strong interpersonal relationships with actors in both the community and health sector, in order to enhance HEW performance. This study aimed to understand how relationships between HEWs, the community and health sector were shaped, in order to inform policy on optimizing HEW performance in providing maternal health services.

methodsWe conducted a qualitative study in six districts in the Sidama zone, which included focus group discussions (FGDs) with HEWs, women and men from the community and semi-structured interviews with HEWs; key informants working in programme management, health service delivery and supervision of HEWs; mothers; and traditional birth attendants. Respondents were asked about facilitators and barriers regarding HEWs' relationships with the community and health sector. Interviews and FGDs were recorded, transcribed, translated, coded and thematically analysed.

resultsHEWs were selected by their communities, which enhanced trust and engagement between them. Relationships were facilitated by programme design elements related to support, referral, supervision, training, monitoring and accountability. Trust, communication and dialogue and expectations influenced the strength of relationships. From the community side, the health development army supported HEWs in liaising with community members. From the health sector side, top-down supervision and inadequate training possibilities hampered relationships and demotivated HEWs. Health professionals, administrators, HEWs and communities occasionally met to monitor HEW and programme performance. Expectations from the community and health sector regarding HEWs' tasks sometimes differed, negatively affecting motivation and satisfaction of HEWs.

conclusionHEWs' relationships with the community and health sector can be constrained as a result of inadequate support systems, lack of trust, communication and dialogue and differing expectations. Clearly defined roles at all levels and standardized support, monitoring and accountability, referral, supervision and training, which are executed regularly with clear communication lines, could improve dialogue and trust between HEWs and actors from the community and health sector. This is important to increase HEW performance and maximize the value of HEWs' unique position.

Indexed as

CommunicationCommunity Health WorkersHealth Care SectorMaternal HealthMaternal Health ServicesResidence CharacteristicsTrustAttitudeDelivery of Health CareEthiopiaFemaleHumansMaleMidwiferyPregnancyQualitative Research

Identifiers

PMID26423049
PMCPMC4589131

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.