Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26422665›Full record

ReviewAnalytical chemistry2016

Miniature and Fieldable Mass Spectrometers: Recent Advances.

Dalton T Snyder, Christopher J Pulliam, Zheng Ouyang, R Graham Cooks

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Analytical chemistry, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 70 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
70citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

70 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Concept and simulation of a MEMS cycloidal mass analyzer.Microsystems & nanoengineering · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. A Hybrid Vacuum Flange RF Oscillator for Low-Cost Mass Spectrometry.Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

10 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Dalton T SnyderDepartment of Chemistry and Center for Analytical Instrumentation Development, Purdue University , West Lafayette, Indiana 47907, United States.
Christopher J PulliamDepartment of Chemistry and Center for Analytical Instrumentation Development, Purdue University , West Lafayette, Indiana 47907, United States.
Zheng OuyangWeldon School of Biomedical Engineering, Purdue University , West Lafayette, Indiana 47907, United States.
R Graham CooksDepartment of Chemistry and Center for Analytical Instrumentation Development, Purdue University , West Lafayette, Indiana 47907, United States.

Funding

Paper Spray Ionization Mass Spectrometry Device for Direct Analysis of Biofluid SR21RR031246 · NCRR · PURDUE UNIVERSITY · PI OUYANG, ZHENG · 2010 to 2011
$358k
2016 SETAC Asia/Pacific ConferenceR13ES027302 · NIEHS · SOCIETY/ENVIRONMENTAL TOXICOLOGY/CHEM · PI MENZIE, CHARLES · 2016 to 2016
$6k
NCRR NIH HHS 5R21RR031246-03NCRR NIH HHS R21 RR031246NIEHS NIH HHS 27302C0028
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

MiniaturizationMass Spectrometry

Identifiers

PMID26422665
PMCPMC5364034

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.