Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26422606›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

Analysis of Transmission of MRSA and ESBL-E among Pigs and Farm Personnel.

Ricarda Maria Schmithausen, Sophia Veronika Schulze-Geisthoevel, Franziska Stemmer, Mohamed El-Jade, Marion Reif, Sylvia Hack, Alina Meilaender, Gabriele Montabauer, Rolf Fimmers, Marijo Parcina and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 96 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Prevalence of Methicillin-ResistantAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  6. High prevalence ofApplied and environmental microbiology · 2025
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. [Therapy-relevant antibiotic resistances in a One Health context].Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz · 2023
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Ricarda Maria SchmithausenInstitute of Medical Microbiology, Immunology and Parasitology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany; Institute of Animal Science, Preventive Health Management Group, University of Bonn, Katzenburgweg 7-9, Bonn, Germany.
Sophia Veronika Schulze-GeisthoevelInstitute of Animal Science, Preventive Health Management Group, University of Bonn, Katzenburgweg 7-9, Bonn, Germany.
Franziska StemmerInstitute of Animal Science, Preventive Health Management Group, University of Bonn, Katzenburgweg 7-9, Bonn, Germany.
Mohamed El-JadeInstitute of Medical Microbiology, Immunology and Parasitology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Marion ReifInstitute of Medical Microbiology, Immunology and Parasitology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Sylvia HackInstitute of Hygiene and Public Health, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Alina MeilaenderInstitute of Medical Microbiology, Immunology and Parasitology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Gabriele MontabauerInstitute of Medical Microbiology, Immunology and Parasitology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Rolf FimmersInstitute of Medical Biometry, Epidemiology and Computer Science, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Marijo ParcinaInstitute of Medical Microbiology, Immunology and Parasitology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Achim HoeraufInstitute of Medical Microbiology, Immunology and Parasitology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Martin ExnerInstitute of Hygiene and Public Health, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Brigitte PetersenInstitute of Animal Science, Preventive Health Management Group, University of Bonn, Katzenburgweg 7-9, Bonn, Germany.
Gabriele BierbaumInstitute of Medical Microbiology, Immunology and Parasitology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Isabelle Bekeredjian-DingInstitute of Medical Microbiology, Immunology and Parasitology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany; Division of EU cooperation/ Microbiology, Paul-Ehrlich-Institute, Langen, Germany.
University Hospital Bonn · DEUniversity of Bonn · DEPaul Ehrlich Institut · DEZimmer Biomet (Germany) · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Livestock-associated bacteria with resistance to two or more antibiotic drug classes have heightened our awareness for the consequences of antibiotic consumption and spread of resistant bacterial strains in the veterinary field. In this study we assessed the prevalence of concomitant colonization with livestock-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (LA-MRSA) and enterobacteriaceae expressing extended-spectrum betalactamases (ESBL-E) in farms at the German-Dutch border region. Nasal colonization of pigs with MRSA (113/547 (20.7%)) was less frequent than rectal colonization with ESBL-E (163/540 (30.2%)). On the individual farm level MRSA correlated with ESBL-E recovery. The data further provide information on prevalence at different stages of pig production, including abattoirs, as well as in air samples and humans living and working on the farms. Notably, MRSA was detected in stable air samples of 34 out of 35 pig farms, highlighting air as an important MRSA transmission reservoir. The majority of MRSA isolates, including those from humans, displayed tetracycline resistance and spa types t011 and t034 characteristic for LA-MRSA, demonstrating transmission from pigs to humans. ESBL-E positive air samples were detected on 6 out of 35 farms but no pig-to-human transmission was found. Detection of ESBL-E, e.g. mostly Escherichia coli with CTX-M-type ESBL, was limited to these six farms. Molecular typing revealed transmission of ESBL-E within the pig compartments; however, related strains were also found on unrelated farms. Although our data suggest that acquisition of MRSA and ESBL-E might occur among pigs in the abattoirs, MRSA and ESBL-E were not detected on the carcasses. Altogether, our data define stable air (MRSA), pig compartments (ESBL-E) and abattoir waiting areas (MRSA and ESBL-E) as major hot spots for transmission of MRSA and/or ESBL-E along the pig production chain.

Indexed as

Animal Husbandrybeta-Lactam ResistanceEscherichia coliMethicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureusAnimalsEscherichia coli InfectionsFemaleHumansMaleStaphylococcal InfectionsSwineZoonoses

Identifiers

PMID26422606
PMCPMC4589321
OpenAlexW2302073274

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.