Trial reportJournal of anxiety disorders2015
Defining treatment response in trichotillomania: a signal detection analysis.
Trial report in Journal of anxiety disorders, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02747771 (The Norwegian Trichotillomania Project), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
The Norwegian Trichotillomania Project
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Measuring Treatment Response in Pediatric Trichotillomania: A Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials.Journal of child and adolescent psychopharmacology · 2020Pooled it
- Neurocognitive functioning in adults with trichotillomania: Predictors of treatment response and symptom severity in a randomized control trial.Behaviour research and therapy · 2024Trial
- The role of psychological flexibility in acceptance-enhanced behavior therapy for trichotillomania: Moderation and mediation findings.Behaviour research and therapy · 2023Trial
- Placebo response in trichotillomania.International clinical psychopharmacology · 2017Trial
- Clinical characteristics of natural recovery in trichotillomania and skin picking disorder.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2025Article
- Massachusetts General Hospital Hairpulling Scale: Validity and Reliability Study of the Turkish Form.Turk psikiyatri dergisi = Turkish journal of psychiatry · 2023Article
- Rapunzel syndrome is not just a mere surgical problem: A case report and review of current management.World journal of clinical cases · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The Massachusetts General Hospital Hairpulling Scale (MGH-HPS) and the NIMH Trichotillomania Severity Scale (NIMH-TSS) are two widely used measures of trichotillomania severity. Despite their popular use, currently no empirically-supported guidelines exist to determine the degrees of change on these scales that best indicate treatment response. Determination of such criteria could aid in clinical decision-making by defining clinically significant treatment response/recovery and producing accurate power analyses for use in clinical trials research. Adults with trichotillomania (N=69) participated in a randomized controlled trial of psychotherapy and were assessed before and after treatment. Response status was measured via the Clinical Global Impressions-Improvement Scale, and remission status was measured via the Clinical Global Impressions-Severity Scale. For treatment response, a 45% reduction or 7-point raw score change on the MGH-HPS was the best indicator of clinically significant treatment response, and on the NIMH-TSS, a 30-40% reduction or 6-point raw score difference was most effective cutoff. For disorder remission, a 55-60% reduction or 7-point raw score change on the MGH-HPS was the best predictor, and on the NIMH-TSS, a 65% reduction or 6-point raw score change was the best indicator of disorder remission. Implications of these findings are discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.