Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26422197›Full record

Trial reportNutrition and cancer2015

A Phase II Randomized Trial of Lycopene-Rich Tomato Extract Among Men with High-Grade Prostatic Intraepithelial Neoplasia.

Peter H Gann, Ryan J Deaton, Erika Enk Rueter, Richard B van Breemen, Larisa Nonn, Virgilia Macias, Misop Han, Viju Ananthanarayanan

Open access · greenAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase II
In one paragraph

Trial report in Nutrition and cancer, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Effect of green tea and lycopene on the insulin-like growth factor system: the ProDiet randomized controlled trial.European journal of cancer prevention : the official journal of the European Cancer Prevention Organisation (ECP) · 2019
    Trial
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Prostate cancer: Therapeutic prospect with herbal medicine.Current research in pharmacology and drug discovery · 2021
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Peter H Ganna Department of Pathology , University of Illinois at Chicago , Chicago , Illinois , USA.
Ryan J Deatona Department of Pathology , University of Illinois at Chicago , Chicago , Illinois , USA.
Erika Enk Ruetera Department of Pathology , University of Illinois at Chicago , Chicago , Illinois , USA.
Richard B van Breemenb Department of Medicinal Chemistry and Pharmacognosy , University of Illinois at Chicago , Chicago , Illinois , USA.
Larisa Nonna Department of Pathology , University of Illinois at Chicago , Chicago , Illinois , USA.
Virgilia Maciasa Department of Pathology , University of Illinois at Chicago , Chicago , Illinois , USA.
Misop Hanc Department of Urology , Johns Hopkins University , Baltimore , Maryland , USA.
Viju Ananthanarayanand Department of Pathology , Loyola University Medical Center , Maywood , Illinois , USA.
University of Illinois Chicago · USJohns Hopkins University · USLoyola University Medical Center · US

Funding

Effects of Lycopene on High-Risk Prostatic TissueR01CA090759 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI GANN, PETER H. · 2002 to 2005
$1.4M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA090759NCI NIH HHS R01 CA90759
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A diverse body of evidence suggests that lycopene might inhibit prostate cancer development. We conducted a 6-mo repeat biopsy randomized trial among men with high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (HGPIN). Here we report results for serum lycopene, prostate specific antigen (PSA) and insulin-like growth factor (IGF) proteins, histopathological review, and tissue markers for proliferation [minichromosome maintenance protein 2 (MCM-2)] and cell cycle inhibition (p27). Participants consumed placebo or tomato extract capsules containing 30 mg/day lycopene. Pre- and posttreatment biopsies were immunostained and digitally scored. Serum lycopene was determined by LC-MS-MS. In secondary analyses, pathologists blindly reviewed each biopsy to score histological features. Fifty-eight men completed the trial. Serum lycopene increased 0.55 μmol/L with treatment and declined 0.29 μmol/L with placebo. We observed no meaningful differences in PSA, IGF-1, or IGF binding protein 3 concentrations between groups, nor any differences in expression of MCM-2 or p27 in epithelial nuclei. Prevalences of cancer, HGPIN, atrophy, or inflammation posttreatment were similar; however, more extensive atrophy and less extensive HGPIN was more common in the lycopene group. Despite large differences in serum lycopene following intervention, no treatment effects were apparent on either the serum or benign tissue endpoints. Larger studies are warranted to determine whether changes observed in extent of HGPIN and focal atrophy can be replicated.

Indexed as

AgedCarotenoidsCell ProliferationDouble-Blind MethodHumansInsulin-Like Growth Factor Binding Protein 3Insulin-Like Growth Factor IKallikreinsLycopeneMaleMiddle AgedMinichromosome Maintenance Complex Component 2Plant ExtractsProstate-Specific AntigenProstatic Intraepithelial NeoplasiaProstatic NeoplasmsCarotenoidsIGFBP3 protein, humanInsulin-Like Growth Factor Binding Protein 3Insulin-Like Growth Factor IKallikreinsKLK3 protein, humanLycopeneMCM2 protein, humanMinichromosome Maintenance Complex Component 2Plant ExtractsProstate-Specific Antigen

Identifiers

PMID26422197
PMCPMC4736719
OpenAlexW2122869033

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.