Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26421287›Full record

ArticleBioMed research international2015

Evaluation of Liver Fibrosis Using Texture Analysis on Combined-Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Images at 3.0T.

Takeshi Yokoo, Tanya Wolfson, Keiko Iwaisako, Michael R Peterson, Haresh Mani, Zachary Goodman, Christopher Changchien, Michael S Middleton, Anthony C Gamst, Sameer M Mazhar and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BioMed research international, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Deep residual nets model for staging liver fibrosis on plain CT images.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2020
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Imaging of Hepatic Fibrosis.Current gastroenterology reports · 2018
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Liver Fibrosis Quantification by Magnetic Resonance Imaging.Topics in magnetic resonance imaging : TMRI · 2017
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Takeshi YokooDepartments of Radiology, University of California, San Diego, CA 92103, USA ; Department of Radiology and Advanced Imaging Research Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 2201 Inwood Road, NE2.210B, Dallas, TX 75390-9085, USA.
Tanya WolfsonComputational and Applied Statistics Laboratory, San Diego Supercomputer Center, University of California, San Diego, CA 92093, USA.
Keiko IwaisakoDepartments of Radiology, University of California, San Diego, CA 92103, USA ; Departments of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, CA 92103, USA ; Department of Target Therapy Oncology, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Michael R PetersonDepartments of Pathology, University of California, San Diego, CA 92103, USA.
Haresh ManiDepartment of Pathology, Penn State Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA 17033, USA.
Zachary GoodmanCenter for Liver Diseases, Inova Fairfax Hospital, Falls Church, VA 22042, USA.
Christopher ChangchienDepartments of Radiology, University of California, San Diego, CA 92103, USA.
Michael S MiddletonDepartments of Radiology, University of California, San Diego, CA 92103, USA.
Anthony C GamstComputational and Applied Statistics Laboratory, San Diego Supercomputer Center, University of California, San Diego, CA 92093, USA.
Sameer M MazharDepartments of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, CA 92103, USA.
Yuko KonoDepartments of Radiology, University of California, San Diego, CA 92103, USA.
Samuel B HoDepartments of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, CA 92103, USA ; VA San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, CA 92161, USA.
Claude B SirlinDepartments of Radiology, University of California, San Diego, CA 92103, USA.

Funding

VIRAL MALIGNANCYP30CA023100 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI Jing Yang · 1985 to 2026
$124.9M
San Diego EXPORT Comprehensive NCMHD Research CenterP60MD000220 · NIMHD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI VILLARREAL, FRANCISCO · 2002 to 2011
$11.0M
Training Grant in GastroenterologyT32DK007202 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI GHOSH, PRADIPTA · 1985 to 2022
$7.7M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA023100NCRR NIH HHS RR0726NIDDK NIH HHS T32 DK007202NIMHD NIH HHS P60 MD000220NIMHD NIH HHS P60 MD00220
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo noninvasively assess liver fibrosis using combined-contrast-enhanced (CCE) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and texture analysis. MATERIALS AND

methodsIn this IRB-approved, HIPAA-compliant prospective study, 46 adults with newly diagnosed HCV infection and recent liver biopsy underwent CCE liver MRI following intravenous administration of superparamagnetic iron oxides (ferumoxides) and gadolinium DTPA (gadopentetate dimeglumine). The image texture of the liver was quantified in regions-of-interest by calculating 165 texture features. Liver biopsy specimens were stained with Masson trichrome and assessed qualitatively (METAVIR fibrosis score) and quantitatively (% collagen stained area). Using L 1 regularization path algorithm, two texture-based multivariate linear models were constructed, one for quantitative and the other for quantitative histology prediction. The prediction performance of each model was assessed using receiver operating characteristics (ROC) and correlation analyses.

resultsThe texture-based predicted fibrosis score significantly correlated with qualitative (r = 0.698, P < 0.001) and quantitative (r = 0.757, P < 0.001) histology. The prediction model for qualitative histology had 0.814-0.976 areas under the curve (AUC), 0.659-1.000 sensitivity, 0.778-0.930 specificity, and 0.674-0.935 accuracy, depending on the binary classification threshold. The prediction model for quantitative histology had 0.742-0.950 AUC, 0.688-1.000 sensitivity, 0.679-0.857 specificity, and 0.696-0.848 accuracy, depending on the binary classification threshold.

conclusionCCE MRI and texture analysis may permit noninvasive assessment of liver fibrosis.

Indexed as

Contrast MediaImage Processing, Computer-AssistedFemaleHumansLiver CirrhosisMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedROC CurveContrast Media

Identifiers

PMID26421287
PMCPMC4569760

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.