ArticleWorld journal of transplantation2015
Effectiveness of repeated transplantations of hematopoietic stem cells in spinal cord injury.
Article in World journal of transplantation, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Mesenchymal Stem Cell Therapy in Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury: A Systematic Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Pooled it
- Clinical translation of stem cell therapy for spinal cord injury still premature: results from a single-arm meta-analysis based on 62 clinical trials.BMC medicine · 2022Pooled it
- Clinical application of stem cell therapy in neurogenic bladder: a systematic review and meta-analysis.International urogynecology journal · 2022Pooled it
- Restoring neuroplasticity after CNS trauma: cell therapy approaches in spinal cord and traumatic brain injury.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Review
- Regenerative Medicine Strategies for Spinal Cord Injury: Advances in Stem Cell Therapy.Brain sciences · 2026Review
- Monitoring outcomes of the first human whole eye allotransplant.Documenta ophthalmologica. Advances in ophthalmology · 2026Article
- Biological and Pharmacological Enhancement of Regeneration in Chronic Spinal Cord Injury.Indian journal of orthopaedics · 2025Article
- Current status and future perspectives on stem cell transplantation for spinal cord injury.World journal of transplantation · 2024Article
- Advancements in neuroregenerative and neuroprotective therapies for traumatic spinal cord injury.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2024Review
- A Novel Magnetic Responsive miR-26a@SPIONs-OECs for Spinal Cord Injury: Triggering Neural Regeneration Program and Orienting Axon Guidance in Inhibitory Astrocytic Environment.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2023Article
- Molecular Mechanisms and Clinical Application of Multipotent Stem Cells for Spinal Cord Injury.Cells · 2022Review
- Progress in Stem Cell Therapy for Spinal Cord Injury.Stem cells international · 2020Review
- Clinical Neurorestorative Therapeutic Guidelines for Spinal Cord Injury (IANR/CANR version 2019).Journal of orthopaedic translation · 2020Review
- Clinical Cell Therapy Guidelines for Neurorestoration (IANR/CANR 2017).Cell transplantation · 2018Article
- Stem cells and their potential clinical applications in psychiatric disorders.Progress in neuro-psychopharmacology & biological psychiatry · 2018Review
- Role of the Hedgehog Signaling Pathway in Regulating the Behavior of Germline Stem Cells.Stem cells international · 2017Review
- Transplantation of Hematopoietic Stem Cells Promotes Functional Improvement Associated with NT-3-MEK-1 Activation in Spinal Cord-Transected Rats.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimTo evaluate the short and long-term effects of the complex cell therapy of 202 cases of spinal cord injury (SCI).
methodsThe main arm included 202 cases of SCI and the control arm included 20 SCI cases. For the therapy the hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) and progenitor cells (PCs) were mobilized to peripheral blood by 8 subcutaneous injections of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) for 4 d and are harvested at day 5. The cells were administered to the main arm intrathecally every 3 mo for a long term (3-5 years) according to the internal research protocol international medical institute of tissue engineering. Magnetic resonance imaging of the site of injury and urodynamic tests were performed every 6 mo. Motor evoked potentials (MEP), somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEP) were evaluated every 3 mo. The patients were evaluated with american spianl injury association (ASIA) index, functional independence measure index, the Medical Research Council Scale, the International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury (ISCSCI-92) and specifically developed scales. The function of bladder was evaluated by a specifically developed clinical scale. The long-term clinical outcomes were assessed for the SCI patients who received no less than 20 intrathecal transplantations of HSCs and hematopoietic precursors (HPs).
resultsThe restoration of neurologic deficit after HSCs and HPs transplantations was proved stable and evident in 57.4% of the cases. In 42.6% cases no neurologic improvement has been observed. In 50% of the cases the motor restoration began after the first transplantation, which is confirmed in average by 9.9 points improvement in neurologic impairment as compared to the baseline (P < 0.05). Repair of the urinary system was observed in 47.7% of the cases. The sensitivity improved from baseline 124.3 points to 138.4 after the first and to 153.5 points after the second transplantations of HSCs and HPs (P < 0.05, between the stages of research). The evaluation with ASIA index demonstrated regress of neurologic symptoms in 23 cases. Motor progress was also assessed with the ISCISCI-92 motor and sensory scores, and the data coincided with those received with the specifically developed scale. The number of the patients with the signs of locomotive repair was 56.9%. No life threatening complications or adverse effects have been observed.
conclusionThe method is safe, effective and considerably improves the life quality of SCI patients. The therapy is approved for clinical use as the treatment of choice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.