Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26421146›Full record

ArticleGigaScience2015

High-coverage sequencing and annotated assembly of the genome of the Australian dragon lizard Pogona vitticeps.

Arthur Georges, Qiye Li, Jinmin Lian, Denis O'Meally, Janine Deakin, Zongji Wang, Pei Zhang, Matthew Fujita, Hardip R Patel, Clare E Holleley and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in GigaScience, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 69 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
69citing papers in PubMed
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

69 citing papers in PubMed, 106 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Convergent High OAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. TruncatedScience advances · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Sex-specific splicing of Z- and W-borneProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

9 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Arthur GeorgesInstitute for Applied Ecology, University of Canberra, Canberra, ACT 2601 Australia.
Qiye LiChina National GeneBank, BGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen, 518083 China ; Centre for GeoGenetics, Natural History Museum of Denmark, University of Copenhagen, Øster Voldgade 5-7, Copenhagen, 1350 Denmark.
Jinmin LianChina National GeneBank, BGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen, 518083 China.
Denis O'MeallyInstitute for Applied Ecology, University of Canberra, Canberra, ACT 2601 Australia.
Janine DeakinInstitute for Applied Ecology, University of Canberra, Canberra, ACT 2601 Australia.
Zongji WangChina National GeneBank, BGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen, 518083 China ; School of Bioscience and Bioengineering, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, 510006 China.
Pei ZhangChina National GeneBank, BGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen, 518083 China.
Matthew FujitaDepartment of Biology, University of Texas at Arlington, 701 S. Nedderman Drive, Arlington, TX 76019 USA.
Hardip R PatelJohn Curtin School of Medical Research, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 2601 Australia.
Clare E HolleleyInstitute for Applied Ecology, University of Canberra, Canberra, ACT 2601 Australia.
Yang ZhouChina National GeneBank, BGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen, 518083 China.
Xiuwen ZhangInstitute for Applied Ecology, University of Canberra, Canberra, ACT 2601 Australia.
Kazumi MatsubaraInstitute for Applied Ecology, University of Canberra, Canberra, ACT 2601 Australia.
Paul WatersSchool of Biotechnology & Biomolecular Sciences, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052 Australia.
Jennifer A Marshall GravesInstitute for Applied Ecology, University of Canberra, Canberra, ACT 2601 Australia ; School of Life Science, La Trobe University, Melbourne, VIC 3086 Australia.
Stephen D SarreInstitute for Applied Ecology, University of Canberra, Canberra, ACT 2601 Australia.
Guojie ZhangChina National GeneBank, BGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen, 518083 China ; Centre for Social Evolution, Department of Biology, University of Copenhagen, Universitetsparken 15, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark.
University of Canberra · AUChina National GeneBank · CNAustralian National University · AUSouth China University of Technology · CNThe University of Texas at Arlington · USUNSW Sydney · AU

Funding

NEW PHYSICAL METHODOLOGIES FOR GENOMIC ANALYSISR01HG000225 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI SCHWARTZ, DAVID C. · 1991 to 2014
$5.2M
Advances in computational gene findingR01HG004348 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI KORF, IAN F · 2007 to 2011
$1.7M
NHGRI NIH HHS R01HG000225NHGRI NIH HHS R01HG004348
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe lizards of the family Agamidae are one of the most prominent elements of the Australian reptile fauna. Here, we present a genomic resource built on the basis of a wild-caught male ZZ central bearded dragon Pogona vitticeps.

findingsThe genomic sequence for P. vitticeps, generated on the Illumina HiSeq 2000 platform, comprised 317 Gbp (179X raw read depth) from 13 insert libraries ranging from 250 bp to 40 kbp. After filtering for low-quality and duplicated reads, 146 Gbp of data (83X) was available for assembly. Exceptionally high levels of heterozygosity (0.85 % of single nucleotide polymorphisms plus sequence insertions or deletions) complicated assembly; nevertheless, 96.4 % of reads mapped back to the assembled scaffolds, indicating that the assembly included most of the sequenced genome. Length of the assembly was 1.8 Gbp in 545,310 scaffolds (69,852 longer than 300 bp), the longest being 14.68 Mbp. N50 was 2.29 Mbp. Genes were annotated on the basis of de novo prediction, similarity to the green anole Anolis carolinensis, Gallus gallus and Homo sapiens proteins, and P. vitticeps transcriptome sequence assemblies, to yield 19,406 protein-coding genes in the assembly, 63 % of which had intact open reading frames. Our assembly captured 99 % (246 of 248) of core CEGMA genes, with 93 % (231) being complete.

conclusionsThe quality of the P. vitticeps assembly is comparable or superior to that of other published squamate genomes, and the annotated P. vitticeps genome can be accessed through a genome browser available at https://genomics.canberra.edu.au.

Indexed as

GenomeHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingAnimalsLizardsAgamidae, Squamata, Next-generation sequencingCentral bearded dragonDragon lizardPogona vitticeps

Identifiers

PMID26421146
PMCPMC4585809
OpenAlexW2158694851

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.