Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26420988›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of nuclear medicine

Modified PISAPED Criteria in Combination with Ventilation Scintigraphic Finding for Predicting Acute Pulmonary Embolism.

Naoyuki Watanabe, Jure Fettich, Nurie Özlem Küçük, Otakar Kraft, Fernando Mut, Partha Choudhury, Surendra K Sharma, Keigo Endo, Maurizio Dondi

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of nuclear medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 7 institutions in 6 countries.

Naoyuki WatanabeDepartment of Nuclear Sciences and Applications, Division of Human Health, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, Austria.
Jure FettichDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Nurie Özlem KüçükDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey.
Otakar KraftDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, University of Strava, Ostrava, Czech Republic.
Fernando MutNuclear Medicine Service, Spanish Association Hospital, Montevideo, Uruguay.
Partha ChoudhuryDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute and Research Centre, New Delhi, India.
Surendra K SharmaDepartment of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Keigo EndoKyoto Medical Science College, Kyoto, Japan.
Maurizio DondiDepartment of Nuclear Sciences and Applications, Division of Human Health, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, Austria.
International Atomic Energy Agency · ATAll India Institute of Medical Sciences · INAnkara University · TRKyoto College of Medical Science · JPLjubljana University Medical Centre · SIRajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute and Research Centre · INUniversity of Ostrava · CZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This prospective clinical study aimed at assessing three pulmonary scintigraphic algorithms to detect acute pulmonary embolism (PE): Lung ventilation/perfusion (V/Q) scintigraphy along with modified prospective investigation of pulmonary embolism diagnosis (PIOPED) criteria; lung perfusion scintigraphy along with prospective investigative study of acute pulmonary embolism diagnosis (PISAPED) criteria; and lung perfusion scan in combination with ventilation scan, along with modified PISAPED criteria, which were newly developed. Patients with suspicion of PE were eligible for this study if they had no abnormal chest x-ray. Their diagnostic workup included a clinical assessment, a pulmonary V/Q scintigraphy, and CT pulmonary angiography (CTPA), as well as a clinical outcome assessment over a period of 24 weeks. Referred to the final clinical diagnosis of patients, the sensitivity and specificity of each algorithm were evaluated. The diagnostic performance of each algorithm by the area under the maximum likelihood fitted receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was determined. With respect to the PISAPED criteria, the sensitivity was 60.8% and specificity was 87.3%. No patient was classified into nondiagnostic category. The PIOPED criteria showed that the sensitivity was 95.0% and specificity was 88.2%, while 57.4% of the patients were in nondiagnostic category. The areas under the ROC curve constructed from the PISAPED criteria results and the modified PIOPED criteria results were 0.734 and 0.859 (P < 0.01), respectively. The modified PISAPED criteria demonstrated that the sensitivity was 83.8% and specificity was 89.1%. No patient was classified into nondiagnostic category. The area under the ROC curve constructed from modified PISAPED criteria was 0.864 (P < 0.01). Perfusion scans used with ventilation scans and modified PISAPED criteria may increase the diagnostic accuracy of pulmonary scintigraphy for acute PE, compared with the two major algorithms.

Indexed as

Acute pulmonary embolismmodified prospective investigation of pulmonary embolism diagnosis criteriamodified prospective investigative study of acute pulmonary embolism diagnosis criteriaPISAPED criteriapulmonary scintigraphy

Identifiers

PMID26420988
PMCPMC4564920
OpenAlexW2097890984

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.