Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26420905›Full record

Trial reportSchizophrenia bulletin2016

Motivational Interviewing to Increase Cognitive Rehabilitation Adherence in Schizophrenia.

Joanna M Fiszdon, Matthew M Kurtz, Jimmy Choi, Morris D Bell, Steve Martino

Open access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Schizophrenia bulletin, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 102 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Schizophrenia and "unmet needs": From diagnosis to care in Italy.European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Joanna M FiszdonDepartment of Psychology, VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, CT; Department of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; Joanna.fiszdon@yale.edu.
Matthew M KurtzDepartment of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; Department of Psychology and Program in Neuroscience and Behavior, Wesleyan University, Middletown, CT;
Jimmy ChoiOlin Neuropsychiatry Research Center, The Institute of Living, Hartford Hospital, Hartford, CT.
Morris D BellDepartment of Psychology, VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, CT; Department of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT;
Steve MartinoDepartment of Psychology, VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, CT; Department of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT;
Yale University · USHartford Hospital · USVA Connecticut Healthcare System · USWesleyan University · US

Funding

Improving cognitive rehabilitation engagement and adherence in schizophreniaI21RX000598 · VA · VA CONNECTICUT HEALTHCARE SYSTEM · PI FISZDON, JOANNA M. · 2012 to 2014
–
RRD VA I21 RX000598
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Adherence to treatment in psychiatric populations is notoriously low. In this randomized, controlled, proof-of-concept study, we sought to examine whether motivational interviewing (MI) could be used to enhance motivation for, adherence to, and benefit obtained from cognitive rehabilitation. Dual diagnosis MI, developed specifically for individuals with psychotic symptoms and disorganization, was further adapted to focus on cognitive impairments and their impact. Sixty-four outpatients diagnosed with schizophrenia spectrum disorders completed baseline assessments and were randomized to receive either the 2-session MI focused on cognitive functioning or a 2-session sham control interview focused on assessment and feedback about preferred learning styles. Next, all participants were given 4 weeks during which they could attend up to 10 sessions of a computer-based math training program, which served as a brief analog for a full course of cognitive rehabilitation. As hypothesized, MI condition was associated with greater increases in task-specific motivation along with greater training program session attendance. Moreover, postinterview motivation level predicted session attendance. There were no significant differences in improvement on a measure of cognitive training content, which may have been due to the abbreviated nature of the training. While the literature on the efficacy of MI for individuals with psychosis has been mixed, we speculate that our positive findings may have been influenced by the adaptations made to MI as well as the focus on a nonpharmacological intervention.

Indexed as

AdultCognitive DysfunctionFemaleHumansLearningMaleMathematicsMiddle AgedMotivational InterviewingPatient ComplianceSchizophreniaTreatment Outcomecognitive remediationcompliancemotivationpsychosistreatment

Identifiers

PMID26420905
PMCPMC4753608
OpenAlexW2306067812

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.