Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26420815›Full record

SynthesisOncotarget2015

Efficacy and safety of capecitabine-based first-line chemotherapy in advanced or metastatic breast cancer: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

Weijiao Yin, Guangsheng Pei, Gang Liu, Li Huang, Shegan Gao, Xiaoshan Feng

Open access · diamondAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Oncotarget, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Weijiao YinDepartment of Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Henan University of Science and Technology, Luoyang, PR, China.
Guangsheng PeiDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Henan University of Science and Technology, Luoyang, PR, China.
Gang LiuDepartment of Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Henan University of Science and Technology, Luoyang, PR, China.
Li HuangDepartment of Gynecology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Henan University of Science and Technology, Luoyang, PR, China.
Shegan GaoDepartment of Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Henan University of Science and Technology, Luoyang, PR, China.
Xiaoshan FengDepartment of Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Henan University of Science and Technology, Luoyang, PR, China.
First Affiliated Hospital of Henan University of Science and Technology · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We sought to evaluate the efficacy and safety of capecitabine-based therapy as first-line chemotherapy in advanced breast cancer. Randomised controlled trials of capecitabine monotherapy or combined treatment were included in the meta-analysis. PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library database and important meeting summaries were searched systematically. Outcomes were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), overall response rate (ORR) and grades 3-4 drug-related adverse events.Nine trials with 1798 patients were included. The results indicated a significant improvement with capecitabine-based chemotherapy compared with capecitabine-free chemotherapy in ORR (relative risk [RR] 1.14, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.03 to 1.26, P = 0.013) and PFS (hazard ratio [HR] 0.77, 95% CI 0.69 to 0.87, P < 0.0001). Overall survival favoured capecitabine-based chemotherapy, but this was not significant. There were more incidences of neutropenia and neutropenic fever in the capecitabine-free chemotherapy group and more vomiting, diarrhoea and hand-foot syndrome in the capecitabine-based chemotherapy group. There were no significant differences in nausea, fatigue, cardiotoxicity or mucositis/stomatitis between the two treatment regimens.Capecitabine-based chemotherapy significantly improves ORR and PFS in patients with advanced breast cancer, but has no demonstrable impact on OS. Capecitabine-based regimens are suitable as first-line treatment for patients with advanced breast cancer.

Indexed as

Antimetabolites, AntineoplasticBreast NeoplasmsCapecitabineDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTreatment OutcomeAntimetabolites, AntineoplasticCapecitabinebreast cancercapecitabinefirst-linemeta-analysis

Identifiers

PMID26420815
PMCPMC4770778
OpenAlexW2179028706

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.