Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26420781›Full record

ReviewBriefings in bioinformatics2016

Recent Advances and Emerging Applications in Text and Data Mining for Biomedical Discovery.

Graciela H Gonzalez, Tasnia Tahsin, Britton C Goodale, Anna C Greene, Casey S Greene

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Multitask Learning-Based Approaches for Protein Function Prediction.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. A survey on data mining techniques used in medicine.Journal of diabetes and metabolic disorders · 2021
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Graciela H Gonzalez
Tasnia Tahsin
Britton C Goodale
Anna C Greene
Casey S Greene

Funding

Social Media Mining for PharmacovigilanceR01LM011176 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI GONZALEZ HERNANDEZ, GRACIELA, SHEN, LI · 2012 to 2021
$4.5M
Low-dose arsenic impacts innate immune response in bronchial epithelial cellsF32ES025082 · NIEHS · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI GOODALE, BRITTON C · 2015 to 2017
$168k
NIEHS NIH HHS F32 ES025082NIEHS NIH HHS F32ES025082NLM NIH HHS R01LM011176
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Precision medicine will revolutionize the way we treat and prevent disease. A major barrier to the implementation of precision medicine that clinicians and translational scientists face is understanding the underlying mechanisms of disease. We are starting to address this challenge through automatic approaches for information extraction, representation and analysis. Recent advances in text and data mining have been applied to a broad spectrum of key biomedical questions in genomics, pharmacogenomics and other fields. We present an overview of the fundamental methods for text and data mining, as well as recent advances and emerging applications toward precision medicine.

Indexed as

Computational BiologyData Interpretation, StatisticalData MiningDrug RepositioningGenomicsHumansPharmacogeneticsPrecision MedicineSignal TransductionToxicologybiomedical discoverydata mininggene prioritizationpharmacogenomicstext miningtoxicology

Identifiers

PMID26420781
PMCPMC4719073

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.