Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26420695›Full record

ArticleBMJ case reports2015

Endoscopic closure of a refractory gastrocutaneous fistula using a novel over-the-scope Padlock clip following de-epithelialisation of the fistula tract.

Arun Abraham, Dipesh H Vasant, John McLaughlin, Peter A Paine

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ case reports, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Endoscopic removal of a weight-loss device with stoma closure using a tack-and-suture device.VideoGIE : an official video journal of the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy · 2023
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Arun AbrahamDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, Salford, Greater Manchester, UK.
Dipesh H VasantDepartment of Gastroenterology, Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, The University Of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
John McLaughlinDepartment of Gastroenterology, Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, The University Of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Peter A PaineDepartment of Gastroenterology, Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, The University Of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Persistent gastrocutaneous fistula (GCF) is a difficult to manage complication following gastrostomy tube removal, with leakage resulting in distressing sequelae including cutaneous injury, infection and dehydration. Many such patients are high-risk for invasive surgery and, to date, endoscopic closure techniques, including clipping systems, have limitations. We present the case of a 62-year-old woman with persistently leaking GCF 6 months postgastrostomy tube removal, despite maximal antisecretory therapy and postpyloric feeding, and describe failed attempted endoscopic closure with conventional clips. Treatment options were discussed and informed consent was given for an attempt at endoscopic closure using a novel radial closure device ('Padlock clip') combined with surgical de-epithelialisation, with the understanding that this device has never previously been used in this setting. At follow-up 2 weeks postprocedure, the patient was asymptomatic with complete healing of the GCF. This approach has advantages over other endoscopic closure techniques and can be considered as an alternative approach to GCF closure.

Indexed as

Cutaneous FistulaDevice RemovalEndoscopyFemaleGastric FistulaGastrostomyHumansMiddle AgedSurgical InstrumentsWound Closure TechniquesWound Healing

Identifiers

PMID26420695
PMCPMC4593293
OpenAlexW2292938693

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.