Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26420261›Full record

ArticleBMC microbiology2015

Xpert MTB/RIF assay can be used on archived gastric aspirate and induced sputum samples for sensitive diagnosis of paediatric tuberculosis.

Sarman Singh, Amit Singh, Suneel Prajapati, Sushil K Kabra, Rakesh Lodha, Aparna Mukherjee, Varinder Singh, Anneke C Hesseling, Harleen M S Grewal, Delhi Pediatric TB study group

Abstract readComparative StudyEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC microbiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Detection of pulmonary tuberculosis in children using the Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra assay on sputum: a multicenter study.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Pediatric TB Management under RNTCP: What and Why?Indian journal of pediatrics · 2019
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Sarman SinghDivision of Clinical Microbiology and Molecular Medicine, Department of Laboratory Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Ansari Nagar, New Delhi, 110 029, India. sarman_singh@yahoo.com.
Amit SinghDivision of Clinical Microbiology and Molecular Medicine, Department of Laboratory Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Ansari Nagar, New Delhi, 110 029, India. amit4us@gmail.com.
Suneel PrajapatiDivision of Clinical Microbiology and Molecular Medicine, Department of Laboratory Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Ansari Nagar, New Delhi, 110 029, India. suneelmicrobio@gmail.com.
Sushil K KabraDepartment of Paediatrics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Ansari Nagar, New Delhi, 110 029, India. skkabra@hotmail.com.
Rakesh LodhaDepartment of Paediatrics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Ansari Nagar, New Delhi, 110 029, India. rakesh_lodha@hotmail.com.
Aparna MukherjeeDepartment of Paediatrics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Ansari Nagar, New Delhi, 110 029, India. aparna.sinha.deb@gmail.com.
Varinder SinghDepartment of Paediatrics, Kalawati Saran Children Hospital, New Delhi, 110 001, India. 4vsingh@gmail.com.
Anneke C HesselingPaediatric Research, Desmond Tutu TB Centre, University of Stellenbosch, Stellenbosch, South Africa. annekeh@sun.ac.za.
Harleen M S GrewalDepartment Clinical Science, Infection, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway. Harleen.Grewal@uib.no.
Delhi Pediatric TB study group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTuberculosis (TB) in children is neglected, mainly due to lack of sensitive diagnostic tools. Recently Xpert MTB/RIF assay has revolutionized the diagnostic field, but its usefulness in pediatric TB has not been reported from India and no report is available on its use on long term archived samples.

methodsWe recruited 130 pediatric patients with probable intrathoracic tuberculosis and their gastric aspirate (GA) and induced sputum (IS) samples on 2 consecutive days were collected between January 2009 and December 2012. All samples (n = 520) were subjected to smear examination, BACTEC-MGIT culture and in-house multiplex PCR. An aliquot of each sample was stored at -80 °C and tested in Xpert MTB/RIF assay in 2013.

resultsSample wise and patient wise detection rate of smear microscopy was 4.4 % and 10 %, while for BACTEC-MGIT culture this rate was 24.4 % and 46.9 %, respectively. Of the 130 day 1 GA samples, 31.5 % and 27.7 % day 2 GA samples were culture positive. Only 17.7 % GA samples were positive on both days. Of the 130 IS samples collected on day 1 and day 2, 15.4 % and 23.1 % samples were culture positive. A combination of GA and IS yielded best results. Combining both GA and IS, the overall sensitivity of Xpert MTB/RIF on smear and culture positive samples was 95.6 %. In smear negative and culture positive samples its sensitivity was 62.5 %. The duration of sample storage impacted the Xpert MTB/RIF test performance (p = 0.0001). In smear positive samples stored for 650-849 days, its sensitivity was 85.7 % and 77.1 % for IS and GA samples which dropped to 33.3 % and 50 %, respectively, if stored for more than 1050 days. DISCUSSION: Confirmatory diagnosis of tuberculosis particularly in children is a medical challenge. No laboratory or radiological test can reach to a satisfactory level of diagnostic sensitivity. However, in this study we found that combination of multiple samples and multiple diagnostic tests can give much better yield, though not optimum. In present study, combination of 2 gastric aspirates (GA) and 2 induced sputum (IS) samples collected on two consecutive days, and tested on three diagnostic methods yielded a significantly high detection rate. Despite long term storage, the overall sensitivity of Xpert MTB/RIF on smear and -culture positive samples remained very high. But after storing these samples under subfreezing conditions the sensitivity of Xpert MTB/RIF decreased significantly. This is expected because even if the sample is smear and culture positive, the count of surviving mycobacteria goes down, after several years this count can reach to a undetectable level.

conclusionThis report shows that smear and culture positive samples stored at subfreezing conditions for several years can be used in the Xpert MTB/RIF assay, while maintaining appreciable diagnostic test sensitivity and specificity.

Indexed as

AdolescentBacteriological TechniquesChildChild, PreschoolFemaleGastric JuiceHumansIndiaInfantMaleMicroscopyMolecular Diagnostic TechniquesMycobacterium tuberculosisRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSensitivity and SpecificitySputum

Identifiers

PMID26420261
PMCPMC4589030

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.