Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26419934›Full record

SynthesisBMC public health2015

A systematic review of community-to-facility neonatal referral completion rates in Africa and Asia.

Naoko Kozuki, Tanya Guenther, Lara Vaz, Allisyn Moran, Sajid B Soofi, Christine Nalwadda Kayemba, Stefan S Peterson, Zulfiqar A Bhutta, Sudhir Khanal, James M Tielsch and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC public health, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Associations between Nugent-bacterial vaginosis and preterm birth and other adverse pregnancy outcomes in rural northwestern Bangladesh.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2026
    Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 8 institutions in 5 countries.

Naoko KozukiDepartment of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 615 N. Wolfe St. W5019, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA. nkozuki@jhu.edu.
Tanya GuentherSave the Children, 2000 L Street NW, Suite 500, Washington, DC, 20036, USA. TGuenther@savechildren.org.
Lara VazSave the Children, 2000 L Street NW, Suite 500, Washington, DC, 20036, USA. LVaz@savechildren.org.
Allisyn MoranSave the Children, 2000 L Street NW, Suite 500, Washington, DC, 20036, USA. allisynmoran@gmail.com.
Sajid B SoofiAga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan. sajid.soofi@aku.edu.
Christine Nalwadda KayembaMakerere University College of Health Sciences School of Public Health, Kampala, Uganda. cnalwadda@musph.ac.ug.
Stefan S PetersonMakerere University College of Health Sciences School of Public Health, Kampala, Uganda. stefan.peterson@kbh.uu.se.
Zulfiqar A BhuttaCenter of Excellence in Women and Child Health, Aga Khan University, Stadium Road, P.O. Box 3500, Karachi, 74800, Pakistan. zulfiqar.bhutta@aku.edu.
Sudhir KhanalMorang Innovative Neonatal Intervention/John Snow Inc. Research and Training Institute, Kathmandu, Nepal. sudhirkhanal@hotmail.com.
James M TielschDepartment of Global Health, George Washington University Milken Institute School of Public Health, 950 New Hampshire Ave., NW, Suite 400, Washington, DC, 20052, USA. jtielsch@email.gwu.edu.
Tanya DohertyHealth Systems Research Unit, South African Medical Research Council, Francie van Zijl Drive, Parow, Cape Town, South Africa. tanya.doherty@mrc.ac.za.
Duduzile NsibandeHealth Systems Research Unit, South African Medical Research Council, 491 Ridge Road, Durban, South Africa. Duduzile.Nsibande@mrc.ac.za.
Joy E LawnSave the Children, 2000 L Street NW, Suite 500, Washington, DC, 20036, USA. joy.lawn@lshtm.ac.uk.
Stephen WallSave the Children, 2000 L Street NW, Suite 500, Washington, DC, 20036, USA. swall@savechildren.org.
Save the Children · USAga Khan University · PKMakerere University · UGSouth African Medical Research Council · ZAInnovative Research (United States) · USJohns Hopkins University · USMilken Institute · USUniversity of London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAn estimated 2.8 million neonatal deaths occur annually worldwide. The vulnerability of newborns makes the timeliness of seeking and receiving care critical for neonatal survival and prevention of long-term sequelae. To better understand the role active referrals by community health workers play in neonatal careseeking, we synthesize data on referral completion rates for neonates with danger signs predictive of mortality or major morbidity in low- and middle-income countries.

methodsA systematic review was conducted in May 2014 of the following databases: Medline-PubMed, Embase, and WHO databases. We also searched grey literature. In addition, an investigator group was established to identify unpublished data on newborn referral and completion rates. Inquiries were made to the network of research groups supported by Save the Children's Saving Newborn Lives project and other relevant research groups.

resultsThree Sub-Saharan African and five South Asian studies reported data on community-to-facility referral completion rates. The studies varied on factors such as referral rates, the assessed danger signs, frequency of home visits in the neonatal period, and what was done to facilitate referrals. Neonatal referral completion rates ranged from 34 to 97 %, with the median rate of 74 %. Four studies reported data on the early neonatal period; early neonatal completion rates ranged from 46 to 97 %, with a median of 70 %. The definition of referral completion differed by studies, in aspects such as where the newborns were referred to and what was considered timely completion.

conclusionsExisting literature reports a wide range of neonatal referral completion rates in Sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia following active illness surveillance. Interpreting these referral completion rates is challenging due to the great variation in study design and context. Often, what qualifies as referral and/or referral completion is poorly defined, which makes it difficult to aggregate existing data to draw appropriate conclusions that can inform programs. Further research is necessary to continue highlighting ways for programs, governments, and policymakers to best aid families in low-resource settings in protecting their newborns from major health consequences.

Indexed as

Community Health WorkersHealth FacilitiesHouse CallsMorbidityReferral and ConsultationResidence CharacteristicsAfrica South of the SaharaAsiaCommunity Health ServicesHumansInfant, NewbornPerinatal Death

Identifiers

PMID26419934
PMCPMC4589085
OpenAlexW2113520166

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.