Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26419731›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2015

Video-based on-ward supervision for final year medical students.

J B Groener, T J Bugaj, R Scarpone, A Koechel, J Stiepak, S Branchereau, M Krautter, W Herzog, C Nikendei

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

J B GroenerDepartment of Endocrinology and Clinical Chemistry, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany. Jan.Groener@med.uni-heidelberg.de.
T J BugajDepartment of General Internal and Psychosomatic Medicine, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany. TillJohannes.Bugaj@med.uni-heidelberg.de.
R ScarponeDepartment of General Internal and Psychosomatic Medicine, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
A KoechelDepartment of General Internal and Psychosomatic Medicine, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany. Ansgar.Koechel@med.uni-heidelberg.de.
J StiepakDepartment of Cardiology, Angiology, Pneumology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany. Jan.Stiepak@med.uni-heidelberg.de.
S BranchereauDepartment of General Internal and Psychosomatic Medicine, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany. Sylvie.Branchereau@med.uni-heidelberg.de.
M KrautterDepartment of Nephrology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany. Markus.Krautter@med.uni-heidelberg.de.
W HerzogDepartment of General Internal and Psychosomatic Medicine, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany. Wolfgang.Herzog@med.uni-heidelberg.de.
C NikendeiDepartment of General Internal and Psychosomatic Medicine, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany. Christoph.Nikendei@med.uni-heidelberg.de.
Heidelberg University · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundConstructive feedback is an essential element of the educational process, helping trainees reach their maximum potential and increasing their skill level. Video-based feedback has been described as highly effective in various educational contexts. The present study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of video-based, on-ward supervision for final year students in a clinical context with real patients.

methodsNine final year medical students (three male, six female; aged 25.1 ± 0.7 years) and eight patients (five male, three female; aged 59.3 ± 16.8 years) participated in the pilot study. Final year students performed routine medical procedures at bedside on internal medicine wards at the University of Heidelberg Medical Hospital. Students were filmed and were under supervision. After performing the procedures, an oral feedback loop was established including student, patient and supervisor feedback on communicative and procedural aspects of skills performed. Finally, students watched their video, focusing on specific teachable moments mentioned by the supervisor. Written evaluations and semi-structured interviews were conducted that focused on the benefits of video-based, on-ward supervision. Interviews were analysed qualitatively, using open coding to establish recurring themes and overarching categories to describe patients' and students' impressions. Descriptive, quantitative analysis was used for questionnaire data.

resultsSupervised, self-chosen skills included history taking (n = 6), physical examination (n = 1), IV cannulation (n = 1), and ECG recording (n = 1). The video-based, on-ward supervision was well accepted by patients and students. Supervisor feedback was rated as highly beneficial, with the video material providing an additional opportunity to focus on crucial aspects and to further validate the supervisor's feedback. Students felt the video material would be less beneficial without the supervisor's feedback. The setting was rated as realistic, with filming not influencing behaviour.

conclusionVideo-based, on-ward supervision may be a powerful tool for improving clinical medical education. However, it should be regarded as an additional tool in combination with supervisors' oral feedback. Acceptance was high in both students and patients. Further research should address possibilities of efficiently combining and routinely establishing these forms of feedback in medical education.

Indexed as

Clinical CompetenceFormative FeedbackVideo RecordingAdultAgedCohort StudiesEducational MeasurementEducation, Medical, UndergraduateFemaleGermanyHospitals, UniversityHumansInternal MedicineMaleMiddle AgedPatients' Rooms

Identifiers

PMID26419731
PMCPMC4588264
OpenAlexW2105244962

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.