Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26419683›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2015

The challenge of vaccinating adults: attitudes and beliefs of the Canadian public and healthcare providers.

D M MacDougall, B A Halperin, D MacKinnon-Cameron, Li Li, S A McNeil, J M Langley, S A Halperin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

D M MacDougallCanadian Center for Vaccinology, Dalhousie University, IWK Health Centre and Nova Scotia Health Authority, Nova Scotia, Canada School of Nursing, St. Francis Xavier University, Nova Scotia, Canada.
B A HalperinCanadian Center for Vaccinology, Dalhousie University, IWK Health Centre and Nova Scotia Health Authority, Nova Scotia, Canada School of Nursing, Dalhousie University, Nova Scotia, Canada Department of Pediatrics, Dalhousie University, Nova Scotia, Canada.
D MacKinnon-CameronCanadian Center for Vaccinology, Dalhousie University, IWK Health Centre and Nova Scotia Health Authority, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Li LiCanadian Center for Vaccinology, Dalhousie University, IWK Health Centre and Nova Scotia Health Authority, Nova Scotia, Canada.
S A McNeilCanadian Center for Vaccinology, Dalhousie University, IWK Health Centre and Nova Scotia Health Authority, Nova Scotia, Canada Department of Medicine, Dalhousie University, Nova Scotia, Canada.
J M LangleyCanadian Center for Vaccinology, Dalhousie University, IWK Health Centre and Nova Scotia Health Authority, Nova Scotia, Canada Department of Pediatrics, Dalhousie University, Nova Scotia, Canada Department of Community Health and Epidemiology, Dalhousie University, Nova Scotia, Canada.
S A HalperinCanadian Center for Vaccinology, Dalhousie University, IWK Health Centre and Nova Scotia Health Authority, Nova Scotia, Canada Department of Pediatrics, Dalhousie University, Nova Scotia, Canada Department of Microbiology & Immunology, Dalhousie University, Nova Scotia, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesVaccine coverage for recommended vaccines is low among adults. The objective of this study was to assess the knowledge, attitudes, beliefs and behaviours of adults and healthcare providers related to four vaccine-preventable diseases and vaccines (diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis, zoster, pneumococcus and influenza).

designWe undertook a survey and focus groups of Canadian adults and healthcare providers (doctors, nurses, pharmacists). A total of 4023 adults completed the survey and 62 participated in the focus groups; 1167 providers completed the survey and 45 participated in the focus groups.

resultsOnly 46.3% of adults thought they were up-to-date on their vaccines; 30% did not know. In contrast, 75.6% of providers reported being up-to-date. Only 57.5% of adults thought it was important to receive all recommended vaccines (compared to 87.1-91.5% of providers). Positive attitudes towards vaccines paralleled concern about the burden of illness and confidence in the vaccines, with providers being more aware of disease burden and confident in vaccine effectiveness than the public. Between 55.0% and 59.7% of adults reported willingness to be vaccinated if recommended by their healthcare provider. However, such recommendations were variable; while 77.4% of the public reported being offered and 52.8% reported being recommended the influenza vaccine by their provider, only 10.8% were offered and 5.6% recommended pertussis vaccine. Barriers and facilitators to improved vaccine coverage in adults, such as trust-mistrust of health authorities, pharmaceutical companies and national recommendations, autonomy versus the public good and logistical issues (such as insufficient time and lack of vaccination status tracking), were identified by both the public and providers.

conclusionsDespite guidelines for adult vaccination, there are substantial gaps in knowledge and attitudes and beliefs among both the public and healthcare providers that lead to low vaccine coverage. A systematic approach that involves education, elimination of barriers and establishing and improving infrastructure for adult immunisation is required.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeAdultAgedCanadaDiphtheria-Tetanus-Pertussis VaccineFemaleFocus GroupsHerpesvirus VaccinesHumansInfluenza VaccinesMaleMiddle AgedPneumococcal VaccinesSurveys and QuestionnairesVaccinationDiphtheria-Tetanus-Pertussis VaccineHerpesvirus VaccinesInfluenza VaccinesPneumococcal VaccinesPUBLIC HEALTH

Identifiers

PMID26419683
PMCPMC4593142

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.