Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26419487›Full record

Trial reportJournal of anesthesia2016

The effect of pregabalin and celecoxib on the analgesic requirements after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized controlled trial.

Usha Gurunathan, Ivan L Rapchuk, Gillian King, Adrian G Barnett, John F Fraser

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of anesthesia, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Usha GurunathanDepartment of Anesthesia and Perfusion Services, The Prince Charles Hospital and School of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia. usha.gurunathan@health.qld.gov.au.
Ivan L RapchukDepartment of Anesthesia and Perfusion Services, The Prince Charles Hospital and School of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Gillian KingSurgical Preadmission Clinic, The Prince Charles Hospital, Brisbane, Australia.
Adrian G BarnettQueensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia.
John F FraserIntensive Care Unit, CCRG, The Prince Charles Hospital, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Prince Charles Hospital · AUUniversity of Queensland · AUQueensland University of Technology · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeEarly postoperative pain is a common complaint after elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The use of non-opioid medications as a part of multimodal analgesia has been increasingly advocated in the management of acute post-surgical pain. This randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study evaluated the efficacy of pregabalin, celecoxib, and their combination in the management of acute postoperative pain in patients undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

methodsOne hundred ASA I/II patients scheduled to undergo elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy were assigned to receive two perioperative doses, 12 h apart, of either pregabalin alone, celecoxib alone, their combination, or a placebo. Standard anesthetic protocol was followed. The primary outcomes were postoperative pain at rest and with movement. Secondary outcomes were fentanyl requirements and side effects, which were assessed at 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, and 24 h following surgery. Patient satisfaction with pain relief was recorded at discharge. Differences in main outcomes were analyzed using an intention-to-treat approach.

resultsThere was no statistically significant difference (p > 0.05) between the four groups in terms of outcomes such as rest pain, movement pain, postoperative fentanyl requirements, or changes in anxiety scores. Patients who had only celecoxib had significantly higher satisfaction with pain management (p = 0.013). Patients who had only pregabalin were at three-times-higher odds of having drowsiness (p = 0.040) and four-times-higher odds of having lightheadedness (p = 0.019) when compared with the placebo group.

conclusionsPregabalin, celecoxib alone, or in combination offers no analgesic superiority over standard opioid care in the treatment of postoperative pain following laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAnalgesicsAnalgesics, OpioidCelecoxibCholecystectomy, LaparoscopicDouble-Blind MethodElective Surgical ProceduresFemaleFentanylHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient SatisfactionPostoperative PainPregabalinAnalgesicsAnalgesics, OpioidCelecoxibFentanylPregabalinCelecoxibLaparoscopic cholecystectomyPostoperative painPregabalin

Identifiers

PMID26419487
OpenAlexW2163466684

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.