Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26419338›Full record

ReviewHeredity2016

Microguards and micromessengers of the genome.

D Green, T Dalmay, T Chapman

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Heredity, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. RNA secondary structure prediction by conducting multi-class classifications.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Stem Cell Therapy against Ischemic Heart Disease.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Novel Insights into the Molecular Mechanisms of Atherosclerosis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  17. The Regulation of Ferroptosis by Noncoding RNAs.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

D GreenNorwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, UK.
T DalmaySchool of Biological Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1492-5429
T ChapmanSchool of Biological Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, UK.
University of East Anglia · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/H008047/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/L003139/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The regulation of gene expression is of fundamental importance to maintain organismal function and integrity and requires a multifaceted and highly ordered sequence of events. The cyclic nature of gene expression is known as 'transcription dynamics'. Disruption or perturbation of these dynamics can result in significant fitness costs arising from genome instability, accelerated ageing and disease. We review recent research that supports the idea that an important new role for small RNAs, particularly microRNAs (miRNAs), is in protecting the genome against short-term transcriptional fluctuations, in a process we term 'microguarding'. An additional emerging role for miRNAs is as 'micromessengers'-through alteration of gene expression in target cells to which they are trafficked within microvesicles. We describe the scant but emerging evidence that miRNAs can be moved between different cells, individuals and even species, to exert biologically significant responses. With these two new roles, miRNAs have the potential to protect against deleterious gene expression variation from perturbation and to themselves perturb the expression of genes in target cells. These interactions between cells will frequently be subject to conflicts of interest when they occur between unrelated cells that lack a coincidence of fitness interests. Hence, there is the potential for miRNAs to represent both a means to resolve conflicts of interest, as well as instigate them. We conclude by exploring this conflict hypothesis, by describing some of the initial evidence consistent with it and proposing new ideas for future research into this exciting topic.

Indexed as

Gene Expression RegulationAnimalsBiological TransportCell-Derived MicroparticlesDrosophila melanogasterFemaleGenetic FitnessHumansMaleMicroRNAsRNA InterferenceTranscriptional ActivationMicroRNAs

Identifiers

PMID26419338
PMCPMC4806885
OpenAlexW2192997923

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.