Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26418678›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2015

Do Instructional Videos on Sputum Submission Result in Increased Tuberculosis Case Detection? A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Grace Mhalu, Jerry Hella, Basra Doulla, Francis Mhimbira, Hawa Mtutu, Helen Hiza, Mohamed Sasamalo, Liliana Rutaihwa, Hans L Rieder, Tamsyn Seimon and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. 'Something so hard': a mixed-methods study of home sputum collection for tuberculosis contact investigation in Uganda.The international journal of tuberculosis and lung disease : the official journal of the International Union against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease · 2018
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Grace MhaluIfakara Health Institute, Bagamoyo and Dar es Salaam, Tanzania; Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Basel, Switzerland; University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Jerry HellaIfakara Health Institute, Bagamoyo and Dar es Salaam, Tanzania; Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Basel, Switzerland; University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Basra DoullaCentral Tuberculosis Reference Laboratory, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania; National Tuberculosis and Leprosy Programme, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Francis MhimbiraIfakara Health Institute, Bagamoyo and Dar es Salaam, Tanzania; Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Basel, Switzerland; University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Hawa MtutuMwananyamala Regional Hospital, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Helen HizaIfakara Health Institute, Bagamoyo and Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Mohamed SasamaloIfakara Health Institute, Bagamoyo and Dar es Salaam, Tanzania; Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Basel, Switzerland; University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Liliana RutaihwaIfakara Health Institute, Bagamoyo and Dar es Salaam, Tanzania; Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Basel, Switzerland; University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Hans L RiederEpidemiology, Biostatistics and Prevention Institute, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland; Research Center Borstel, Leibniz-Center for Medicine and Biosciences, Borstel, Germany.
Tamsyn SeimonInteractive Research & Development, Lausanne, Switzerland and Pakistan.
Beatrice MutayobaNational Tuberculosis and Leprosy Programme, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Mitchell G WeissSwiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Basel, Switzerland; University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Lukas FennerIfakara Health Institute, Bagamoyo and Dar es Salaam, Tanzania; Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Basel, Switzerland; University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland; Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Ifakara Health Institute · TZInteractive Research and Development · PKSwiss Tropical and Public Health Institute · CHUniversity of Basel · CHUniversity of Zurich · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveWe examined the effect of an instructional video about the production of diagnostic sputum on case detection of tuberculosis (TB), and evaluated the acceptance of the video. TRIAL

designRandomized controlled trial.

methodsWe prepared a culturally adapted instructional video for sputum submission. We analyzed 200 presumptive TB cases coughing for more than two weeks who attended the outpatient department of the governmental Municipal Hospital in Mwananyamala (Dar es Salaam, Tanzania). They were randomly assigned to either receive instructions on sputum submission using the video before submission (intervention group, n = 100) or standard of care (control group, n = 100). Sputum samples were examined for volume, quality and presence of acid-fast bacilli by experienced laboratory technicians blinded to study groups.

resultsMedian age was 39.1 years (interquartile range 37.0-50.0); 94 (47%) were females, 106 (53%) were males, and 49 (24.5%) were HIV-infected. We found that the instructional video intervention was associated with detection of a higher proportion of microscopically confirmed cases (56%, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 45.7-65.9%, sputum smear positive patients in the intervention group versus 23%, 95% CI 15.2-32.5%, in the control group, p <0.0001), an increase in volume of specimen defined as a volume ≥3ml (78%, 95% CI 68.6-85.7%, versus 45%, 95% CI 35.0-55.3%, p <0.0001), and specimens less likely to be salivary (14%, 95% CI 7.9-22.4%, versus 39%, 95% CI 29.4-49.3%, p = 0.0001). Older age, but not the HIV status or sex, modified the effectiveness of the intervention by improving it positively. When asked how well the video instructions were understood, the majority of patients in the intervention group reported to have understood the video instructions well (97%). Most of the patients thought the video would be useful in the cultural setting of Tanzania (92%).

conclusionsSputum submission instructional videos increased the yield of tuberculosis cases through better quality of sputum samples. If confirmed in larger studies, instructional videos may have a substantial effect on the case yield using sputum microscopy and also molecular tests. This low-cost strategy should be considered as part of the efforts to control TB in resource-limited settings.

trial registrationPan African Clinical Trials Registry PACTR201504001098231.

Indexed as

AdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMycobacterium tuberculosisPatient Education as TopicSputumSurveys and QuestionnairesTanzaniaTuberculosis, Pulmonary

Identifiers

PMID26418678
PMCPMC4587748
OpenAlexW2150685628

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.