Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26418356›Full record

ArticlemAbs2016

The European antibody network's practical guide to finding and validating suitable antibodies for research.

Giovanna Roncador, Pablo Engel, Lorena Maestre, Amanda P Anderson, Jacqueline L Cordell, Mark S Cragg, Vladka Č Šerbec, Margaret Jones, Vanda J Lisnic, Leonor Kremer and 8 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in mAbs, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 61 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. January in focus in HCB: antibody validation.Histochemistry and cell biology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Data-driven evaluation of suitable immunogens for improved antibody selection.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Decision Tree for Protein Biomarker Selection for Clinical Applications.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Evaluation of Antibodies for Vascular Smooth Muscle Cell Characterization.Stem cell and regenerative medicine (Wilmington, Del.) · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Development of Antibody and Nanobody Tools for P2X7.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022
    Article
  18. Double Labeling Fluorescent Immunocytochemistry.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022
    Article
  19. Rodent Models of Congenital Cytomegalovirus Infection.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2021
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 13 institutions in 8 countries.

Giovanna Roncadora Monoclonal Antibody Unit; Spanish National Cancer Research Center ; Madrid , Spain.
Pablo Engelb Immunology Unit, Department of Cell Biology; Immunology and Neurosciences ; Medical School, University of Barcelona ; Spain.
Lorena Maestrea Monoclonal Antibody Unit; Spanish National Cancer Research Center ; Madrid , Spain.
Amanda P Andersonc NDCLS, Radcliffe Department of Medicine ; University of Oxford ; Oxford , UK.
Jacqueline L Cordelld OxFabs; University of Oxford ; Oxford UK.
Mark S Cragge Antibody and Vaccine Group; Cancer Sciences Unit; University of Southampton; Faculty of Medicine; General Hospital , Southampton , UK.
Vladka Č Šerbecf Center for the Production of Diagnostic Reagents and for Research; Blood Transfusion Center of Slovenia ; Ljubljana , Slovenia.
Margaret Jonesc NDCLS, Radcliffe Department of Medicine ; University of Oxford ; Oxford , UK.
Vanda J Lisnicg Center for Proteomics; Faculty of Medicine; University of Rijeka ; Rijeka , Croatia.
Leonor Kremerh Department of Immunology and Oncology ; Spanish National Center for Biotechnology; Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CNB/CSIC) ; Madrid , Spain.
Demin Lic NDCLS, Radcliffe Department of Medicine ; University of Oxford ; Oxford , UK.
Friedrich Koch-Noltei Institute of Immunology; University Medical Center ; Hamburg , 20246 Germany.
Núria Pascualj Custom Antibody Service (CAbS); IQAC-CSIC/CIBER-BBN ; Barcelona , Spain.
Jose-Ignacio Rodríguez-Barbosak Section of Immunobiology; Institute of Biomedicine; University of Leon ; Léon , Spain.
Ruurd Torensmal Department of Tumorimmunology ; Radboud University Medical Center ; Nijmegen , The Netherlands.
Helen Turleyc NDCLS, Radcliffe Department of Medicine ; University of Oxford ; Oxford , UK.
Karen Pulfordc NDCLS, Radcliffe Department of Medicine ; University of Oxford ; Oxford , UK.
Alison H Banhamc NDCLS, Radcliffe Department of Medicine ; University of Oxford ; Oxford , UK.
University of Oxford · GBScience Oxford · GBBiomedical Research Networking Center in Bioengineering, Biomaterials and Nanomedicine · ESBlood Transfusion Centre of Slovenia · SICancer Research Center · USCentro de Investigación del Cáncer · ESConsejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas · ESFaculty (United Kingdom) · GBInstitute of Immunology · HRUniversidad de León · ESUniversitat de Barcelona · ESUniversity Medical Center · USUniversity of Southampton · GB

Funding

Cancer Research UK 10702
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Antibodies are widely exploited as research/diagnostic tools and therapeutics. Despite providing exciting research opportunities, the multitude of available antibodies also offers a bewildering array of choice. Importantly, not all companies comply with the highest standards, and thus many reagents fail basic validation tests. The responsibility for antibodies being fit for purpose rests, surprisingly, with their user. This paper condenses the extensive experience of the European Monoclonal Antibody Network to help researchers identify antibodies specific for their target antigen. A stepwise strategy is provided for prioritising antibodies and making informed decisions regarding further essential validation requirements. Web-based antibody validation guides provide practical approaches for testing antibody activity and specificity. We aim to enable researchers with little or no prior experience of antibody characterization to understand how to determine the suitability of their antibody for its intended purpose, enabling both time and cost effective generation of high quality antibody-based data fit for publication.

Indexed as

Biomedical ResearchDatabases, FactualAnimalsAntibodies, MonoclonalEuropeHumansAntibodies, MonoclonalBLAST searchesCiteAbEuroMAbNetflow cytometrygene silencingHLDA workshopsimmunohistochemistrymonoclonal antibodiesvalidation studieswestern blotting

Identifiers

PMID26418356
PMCPMC4966524
OpenAlexW1813312212

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.