Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26418270›Full record

ArticleBiopreservation and biobanking2015

The Informatics Challenges Facing Biobanks: A Perspective from a United Kingdom Biobanking Network.

Philip R Quinlan, Martin Groves, Lee B Jordan, Hilary Stobart, Colin A Purdie, Alastair M Thompson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biopreservation and biobanking, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Philip R Quinlan1 Dundee Cancer Centre, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School , Dundee, United Kingdom .
Martin Groves1 Dundee Cancer Centre, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School , Dundee, United Kingdom .
Lee B Jordan5 NHS Tayside, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School , Dundee, United Kingdom .
Hilary Stobart6 Independent Cancer Patients Voice , London, United Kingdom .
Colin A Purdie5 NHS Tayside, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School , Dundee, United Kingdom .
Alastair M Thompson1 Dundee Cancer Centre, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School , Dundee, United Kingdom .

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The challenges facing biobanks are changing from simple collections of materials to quality-assured fit-for-purpose clinically annotated samples. As a result, informatics awareness and capabilities of a biobank are now intrinsically related to quality. A biobank may be considered a data repository, in the form of raw data (the unprocessed samples), data surrounding the samples (processing and storage conditions), supplementary data (such as clinical annotations), and an increasing ethical requirement for biobanks to have a mechanism for researchers to return their data. The informatics capabilities of a biobank are no longer simply knowing sample locations; instead the capabilities will become a distinguishing factor in the ability of a biobank to provide appropriate samples. There is an increasing requirement for biobanking systems (whether in-house or commercially sourced) to ensure the informatics systems stay apace with the changes being experienced by the biobanking community. In turn, there is a requirement for the biobanks to have a clear informatics policy and directive that is embedded into the wider decision making process. As an example, the Breast Cancer Campaign Tissue Bank in the UK was a collaboration between four individual and diverse biobanks in the UK, and an informatics platform has been developed to address the challenges of running a distributed network. From developing such a system there are key observations about what can or cannot be achieved by informatics in isolation. This article will highlight some of the lessons learned during this development process.

Indexed as

Biological Specimen BanksBiomedical ResearchInformaticsHumansUnited KingdomUser-Computer Interface

Identifiers

PMID26418270
PMCPMC4675179

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.