Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26418237›Full record

ArticleHippocampus2016

LTP enhances synaptogenesis in the developing hippocampus.

Deborah J Watson, Linnaea Ostroff, Guan Cao, Patrick H Parker, Heather Smith, Kristen M Harris

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Hippocampus, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Neuronal Actin Remodeling and Its Role in Higher Nervous Activity.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Rapid Ultrastructural Changes in the PSD and Surrounding Membrane after Induction of Structural LTP in Single Dendritic Spines.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Structural synaptic plasticity across sleep and wake.Current opinion in physiology · 2020
    Review
  17. Inefficient thermogenic mitochondrial respiration due to futile proton leak in a mouse model of fragile X syndrome.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2020
    Article
  18. Synaptic Odyssey.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2020
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Deborah J WatsonDepartment of Neuroscience, Center for Learning and Memory, Institute for Neuroscience, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, 78731.
Linnaea OstroffAllen Brain Institute, 551 N 34th St, Seattle, Washington, 98103.
Guan CaoDepartment of Neuroscience, Center for Learning and Memory, Institute for Neuroscience, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, 78731.
Patrick H ParkerDepartment of Neuroscience, Center for Learning and Memory, Institute for Neuroscience, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, 78731.
Heather SmithDepartment of Neuroscience, Center for Learning and Memory, Institute for Neuroscience, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, 78731.
Kristen M HarrisDepartment of Neuroscience, Center for Learning and Memory, Institute for Neuroscience, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, 78731.
The University of Texas at Austin · USAllen Institute · US

Funding

Synaptic plasticity across the lifespanR01MH095980 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI KRISTEN M HARRIS · 2012 to 2026
$5.0M
Synapse growth and elimination in mature CNSR01MH104319 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI HARRIS, KRISTEN M · 2014 to 2018
$1.8M
Distance-Dependent Structure and Function of Neuronal DendritesR01NS074644 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI HARRIS, KRISTEN M · 2011 to 2015
$1.7M
SPINES SYNAPSES AND THE ONTOGENY OF A MEMORY MECHANISMR01NS021184 · NINDS · MEDICAL COLLEGE OF GEORGIA (MCG) · PI HARRIS, KRISTEN M · 1988 to 2003
$1.4M
Synaptic plasticity across the lifespanR56MH095980 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI HARRIS, KRISTEN M · 2019 to 2019
$619k
Dynamic regulation of SER during development and synaptic plasticityF32MH096459 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI WATSON, DEBORAH JEAN · 2012 to 2014
$163k
NIMH NIH HHS F32 MH096459NIMH NIH HHS MH095980NIMH NIH HHS MH096459NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH095980NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH104319NIMH NIH HHS R56 MH095980NINDS NIH HHS NS074644NINDS NIH HHS NS201184NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS021184NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS074644
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In adult hippocampus, long-term potentiation (LTP) produces synapse enlargement while preventing the formation of new small dendritic spines. Here, we tested how LTP affects structural synaptic plasticity in hippocampal area CA1 of Long-Evans rats at postnatal day 15 (P15). P15 is an age of robust synaptogenesis when less than 35% of dendritic spines have formed. We hypothesized that LTP might therefore have a different effect on synapse structure than in adults. Theta-burst stimulation (TBS) was used to induce LTP at one site and control stimulation was delivered at an independent site, both within s. radiatum of the same hippocampal slice. Slices were rapidly fixed at 5, 30, and 120 min after TBS, and processed for analysis by three-dimensional reconstruction from serial section electron microscopy (3DEM). All findings were compared to hippocampus that was perfusion-fixed (PF) in vivo at P15. Excitatory and inhibitory synapses on dendritic spines and shafts were distinguished from synaptic precursors, including filopodia and surface specializations. The potentiated response plateaued between 5 and 30 min and remained potentiated prior to fixation. TBS resulted in more small spines relative to PF by 30 min. This TBS-related spine increase lasted 120 min, hence, there were substantially more small spines with LTP than in the control or PF conditions. In contrast, control test pulses resulted in spine loss relative to PF by 120 min, but not earlier. The findings provide accurate new measurements of spine and synapse densities and sizes. The added or lost spines had small synapses, took time to form or disappear, and did not result in elevated potentiation or depression at 120 min. Thus, at P15 the spines formed following TBS, or lost with control stimulation, appear to be functionally silent. With TBS, existing synapses were awakened and then new spines formed as potential substrates for subsequent plasticity.

Indexed as

Analysis of VarianceAnimalsAnimals, NewbornBiophysicsDendritic SpinesElectric StimulationHippocampusImaging, Three-DimensionalIn Vitro TechniquesLong-Term PotentiationMicroscopy, ElectronNeurogenesisPatch-Clamp TechniquesRatsRats, Long-EvansSynapses3DEMpostnatal day 15synapsesthetaburst stimulationultrastructure

Identifiers

PMID26418237
PMCPMC4811749
OpenAlexW1873170978

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.