Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26417954›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in HIV and AIDS2016

Tenofovir-based oral preexposure prophylaxis prevents HIV infection among women.

Kerry A Thomson, Jared M Baeten, Nelly R Mugo, Linda-Gail Bekker, Connie L Celum, Renee Heffron

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in HIV and AIDS, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 86 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
86citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

86 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Assessing Non-Oral PrEP Alternatives Among Young Black Women in the Southern USA.Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities · 2026
    Article
  20. Article

26 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Kerry A ThomsonaDepartment of Global Health bDepartment of Epidemiology cDepartment of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, USA dSexual Reproductive Adolescent and Child Health Program, Kenya Medical Research Institute, Nairobi, Kenya eThe Desmond Tutu HIV Centre, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
Jared M Baeten
Nelly R Mugo
Linda-Gail Bekker
Connie L Celum
Renee Heffron

Funding

Optimizing Antiretroviral-Based HIV Prevention for HIV Serodiscordant CouplesR01MH095507 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI BAETEN, JARED · 2011 to 2020
$6.1M
Antiretroviral periconception HIV prevention for HIV discordant couplesR00HD076679 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI HEFFRON, RENEE A. · 2015 to 2017
$742k
NICHD NIH HHS R00 HD076679NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH095507
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewDespite tremendous promise as a female-controlled HIV prevention strategy, implementation of preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP) among women has been limited, in part because of disparate efficacy results from randomized trials in this population. This review synthesizes existing evidence regarding PrEP efficacy for preventing HIV infection in women and considerations for delivering PrEP to women. RECENT

findingsIn three efficacy trials, conducted among men and women, tenofovir-based oral PrEP reduced HIV acquisition in subgroups of women by 49-79% in intent-to-treat analyses, and by >85% when accounting for PrEP adherence. Two trials did not demonstrate an HIV prevention benefit from PrEP in women, but substantial evidence indicates those results were compromised by very low adherence to the study medication. Qualitative research has identified risk perception, stigma, and aspects of clinical trial participation as influencing adherence to study medication. Pharmacokinetic studies provide supporting evidence that PrEP offers HIV protection in women who are adherent to the medication. SUMMARY: Tenofovir-based daily oral PrEP prevents HIV acquisition in women. Offering PrEP as an HIV prevention option for women at high risk of HIV acquisition is a public health imperative and opportunities to evaluate implementation strategies for PrEP for women are needed.

Indexed as

Medication AdherenceAdministration, OralAnti-HIV AgentsChemopreventionDisease Transmission, InfectiousFemaleHIV InfectionsHumansMalePre-Exposure ProphylaxisTenofovirTreatment OutcomeAnti-HIV AgentsTenofovir

Identifiers

PMID26417954
PMCPMC4705855

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.