Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26417260›Full record

ReviewEXCLI journal2014

Nanoencapsulation for drug delivery.

Avnesh Kumari, Rubbel Singla, Anika Guliani, Sudesh Kumar Yadav

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in EXCLI journal, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 167 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Anticancer potential of lactoferrin: effects, drug synergy and molecular interactions.Biometals : an international journal on the role of metal ions in biology, biochemistry, and medicine · 2025
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Stimuli-Responsive Boron-Based Materials in Drug Delivery.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Avnesh KumariBiotechnology Division, CSIR - Institute of Himalayan Bioresource Technology, Palampur-176061 (H.P.), India.
Rubbel SinglaBiotechnology Division, CSIR - Institute of Himalayan Bioresource Technology, Palampur-176061 (H.P.), India ; Academy of Scientific and Innovative Research, New Delhi, India.
Anika GulianiBiotechnology Division, CSIR - Institute of Himalayan Bioresource Technology, Palampur-176061 (H.P.), India.
Sudesh Kumar YadavBiotechnology Division, CSIR - Institute of Himalayan Bioresource Technology, Palampur-176061 (H.P.), India ; Academy of Scientific and Innovative Research, New Delhi, India.
Institute of Himalayan Bioresource Technology · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nanoencapsulation of drug/small molecules in nanocarriers (NCs) is a very promising approach for development of nanomedicine. Modern drug encapsulation methods allow efficient loading of drug molecules inside the NCs thereby reducing systemic toxicity associated with drugs. Targeting of NCs can enhance the accumulation of nanonencapsulated drug at the diseased site. This article focussed on the synthesis methods, drug loading, drug release mechanism and cellular response of nanoencapsulated drugs on liposomes, micelles, carbon nanotubes, dendrimers, and magnetic NCs. Also the uses of these various NCs have been highlighted in the field of nanotechnology.

Indexed as

carbon nanotubedendrimersliposomesmagneticmicellesnanocarriers

Identifiers

PMID26417260
PMCPMC4464443
OpenAlexW2292003813

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.