Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26417160›Full record

ArticleJournal of laboratory physicians

Prevalence of Mupirocin Resistance Among Staphylococci, its Clinical Significance and Relationship to Clinical Use.

Manohar Shoorashetty Rudresh, Giriyapur Siddappa Ravi, Aravind Motagi, Ann Mary Alex, Parthasarathi Sandhya, Bangalore Viswanath Navaneeth

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of laboratory physicians. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Prevalence of Methicillin-resistantOman medical journal · 2022
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. The effect of fennel essential oil andPostepy dermatologii i alergologii · 2019
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Manohar Shoorashetty RudreshDepartment of Microbiology, ESIC MC and PGIMSR, Rajajinagar, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
Giriyapur Siddappa RaviDepartment of Microbiology, ESIC MC and PGIMSR, Rajajinagar, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
Aravind MotagiDepartment of Microbiology, ESIC MH, Indore, Madhya Pradesh, India.
Ann Mary AlexDepartment of Microbiology, ESIC MC and PGIMSR, Rajajinagar, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
Parthasarathi SandhyaDepartment of Microbiology, ESIC MC and PGIMSR, Rajajinagar, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
Bangalore Viswanath NavaneethDepartment of Microbiology, ESIC MC and PGIMSR, Rajajinagar, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
ESI - Post Graduate Institute of Medical Science and Research · INESIC Hospital · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionMupirocin competitively inhibits bacterial isoleucyl transfer-RNA synthetase and inhibit bacterial protein synthesis. Widespread usage and over the counter availability of the drug has resulted in resistance among Staphylococcus species.

objectivesThis study aimed to determine the overall prevalence of mupirocin resistance among staphylococci. Correlate clinical significance of mupirocin resistance and its relationship to clinical use.

methodsConsecutive, nonrepetitive, clinical isolates of Staphylococcus aureus (n = 98), and coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) (n = 45) from skin and soft-tissue infections between January 2014 and June 2014 were studied. Antibiotic susceptibility testing was done according to Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines. Low- and high-level mupirocin resistance was screened by using 5 µg and 200 µg discs respectively and confirmed by agar dilution. Annual consumption of mupirocin was studied and correlated with resistance.

resultsHigh-level mupirocin resistance was found in 8.2% S. aureus and 15.6% of CoNS, while low-level mupirocin resistance was found in 17% S. aureus and 8.9% CoNS. High-level mupirocin resistance was more common in methicillin-sensitive S. aureus isolates when compared with methicillin-resistant S. aureus isolates (P < 0.05). Mupirocin resistant S. epidermidis were associated with methicillin resistance and constitutive clindamycin resistance.

conclusionHigh prevalence of mupirocin resistance was found in the present study. Increased prevalence of mupirocin resistance among community-acquired staphylococci demands the judicious use of the drug in the community.

Indexed as

Coagulase-negative staphylococcimethicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureusmethicillin sensitive Staphylococcus aureusmupirocin resistanceStaphylococus aureus

Identifiers

PMID26417160
PMCPMC4559621
OpenAlexW1874829495

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.