Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26417086›Full record

Trial reportProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2015

Genetic specificity of face recognition.

Nicholas G Shakeshaft, Robert Plomin

Abstract readClinical TrialTwin Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Understanding trait impressions from faces.British journal of psychology (London, England : 1953) · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Nicholas G ShakeshaftMedical Research Council Social, Genetic and Developmental Psychiatry Centre, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London SE5 8AF, United Kingdom nicholas.shakeshaft@kcl.ac.uk.
Robert PlominMedical Research Council Social, Genetic and Developmental Psychiatry Centre, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London SE5 8AF, United Kingdom.

Funding

Genetics, School environments and cognitive developmentR01HD044454 · NICHD · KING'S COLLEGE LONDON · PI PLOMIN, ROBERT · 2005 to 2014
$3.4M
Genetics of Mathematical Cognition and DisabilitiesR01HD059215 · NICHD · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI PETRILL, STEPHEN A. · 2009 to 2012
$2.4M
European Research Council 295366Medical Research Council G0500079Medical Research Council G0901245Medical Research Council G19/2Medical Research Council G9817803NICHD NIH HHS HD044454NICHD NIH HHS HD059215NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD044454NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD059215
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Specific cognitive abilities in diverse domains are typically found to be highly heritable and substantially correlated with general cognitive ability (g), both phenotypically and genetically. Recent twin studies have found the ability to memorize and recognize faces to be an exception, being similarly heritable but phenotypically substantially uncorrelated both with g and with general object recognition. However, the genetic relationships between face recognition and other abilities (the extent to which they share a common genetic etiology) cannot be determined from phenotypic associations. In this, to our knowledge, first study of the genetic associations between face recognition and other domains, 2,000 18- and 19-year-old United Kingdom twins completed tests assessing their face recognition, object recognition, and general cognitive abilities. Results confirmed the substantial heritability of face recognition (61%), and multivariate genetic analyses found that most of this genetic influence is unique and not shared with other cognitive abilities.

Indexed as

FaceTwins, DizygoticTwins, MonozygoticAdolescentAdultCognitionFemaleHumansMaleRecognition, PsychologyVisual Perceptionbehavioral geneticscognitive psychologyface perceptiontwin study

Identifiers

PMID26417086
PMCPMC4611634

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.