Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26417039›Full record

Trial reportThe oncologist2015

Outpatient Intraperitoneal Catumaxomab Therapy for Malignant Ascites Related to Advanced Gynecologic Neoplasms.

Christian Martin Kurbacher, Olympia Horn, Jutta Anna Kurbacher, Susanne Herz, Ann Tabea Kurbacher, Ralf Hildenbrand, Reinhardt Bollmann

Open access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The oncologist, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Contemporary Management of Malignant Ascites.The Journal of surgical research · 2025
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Christian Martin KurbacherDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics I (Gynecologic Oncology), Gynecologic Center Bonn-Friedensplatz, Bonn, Germany Faculty of Medicine, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany Praxis.Kurbacher@online.ms.
Olympia HornDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics I (Gynecologic Oncology), Gynecologic Center Bonn-Friedensplatz, Bonn, Germany.
Jutta Anna KurbacherDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics II (General Gynecology and Obstetrics), Gynecologic Center Bonn-Friedensplatz, Bonn, Germany.
Susanne HerzDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics I (Gynecologic Oncology), Gynecologic Center Bonn-Friedensplatz, Bonn, Germany.
Ann Tabea KurbacherDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics I (Gynecologic Oncology), Gynecologic Center Bonn-Friedensplatz, Bonn, Germany.
Ralf HildenbrandInstitute of Pathology Bonn-Duisdorf, Bonn, Germany.
Reinhardt BollmannInstitute of Pathology Bonn-Duisdorf, Bonn, Germany.
University of Cologne · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCatumaxomab (CATU) is a trifunctional antibody approved for intraperitoneal (i.p.) treatment of malignant ascites (MA) related to carcinomas expressing the epithelial cell-adhesion molecule (EpCAM). CATU is mostly given to hospitalized patients, although outpatient treatment seems appropriate in selected individuals. This observational trial sought to obtain more detailed information regarding the feasibility of CATU in outpatients with MA related to various gynecologic tumors, including epithelial ovarian (EOC) and metastatic breast cancer (MBC). MATERIALS AND

methodsA total of 30 patients were included, 17 with EOC, 7 with MBC, and 6 with other malignancies. The patients had failed a median of 5 (range 1-12) previous systemic treatments. CATU was administered via an indwelling i.p. catheter at four increasing doses (i.e., 10, 20, 50, and 150 µg) given at 4-day intervals over 2 weeks. Toxicities were scored according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 4.03. Puncture-free survival (PuFS) was calculated from the start of CATU until the next puncture for MA, death, or loss to follow-up. Overall survival (OS) was calculated from the start of CATU to death from any reason or loss to follow-up. We also investigated various clinical parameters to predict PuFS and OS. These included age, tumor type, performance status, intensity of pretreatment, presence of extraperitoneal metastases, relative lymphocyte count at baseline, patient adherence to therapy, and the patients' ability to undergo systemic treatment after CATU.

resultsCATU was exclusively given on an outpatient basis, and 19 patients (63.3%) received all four planned i.p. instillations. Toxicity was the reason for discontinuation in only 2 patients. Toxicity was generally manageable, with abdominal pain, nausea/vomiting, fatigue, and fever the predominant adverse effects. Secondary hospitalization was necessary for 7 patients (23.3%), with a general deteriorated condition in 5 and fever/infection or abdominal pain in 1 patient each. Subsequent systemic treatment was possible in 11 patients (36.7%). Only 5 patients (16.7%) required a second puncture after i.p. CATU. The median PuFS was 56 days, and the median OS was 79.5 days. Positive predictors of both PuFS and OS were performance status, absence of extraperitoneal tumor, the capability to receive all four CATU infusions, and the ability to undergo subsequent systemic treatment.

conclusionOutpatient i.p. CATU therapy for MA related to various gynecologic carcinomas is safe and effective in producing good ascites control in most individuals, allowing for subsequent systemic therapy in a substantial proportion of patients. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Intraperitoneal treatment with the trifunctional antibody catumaxomab (CATU) was possible in a selected population of 30 outpatients with malignant ascites due to epithelial female genital tract or breast carcinoma. Toxicity was largely manageable. Patients in good condition at baseline, without extraperitoneal tumor and/or liver metastases, and with the ability to complete all four planned CATU instillations and the capability of undergoing subsequent systemic therapy benefited the most in terms of both puncture-free and overall survival. Outpatient i.p. CATU is safe and effective in a selected group of patients with malignant ascites due to various gynecologic malignancies and could be cost-saving compared with an inpatient approach.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAntibodies, BispecificAntigens, NeoplasmAscitesCell Adhesion MoleculesDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsEpithelial Cell Adhesion MoleculeFemaleGenital Neoplasms, FemaleHumansInjections, IntraperitonealMiddle AgedOutpatientsAntibodies, BispecificAntigens, NeoplasmcatumaxomabCell Adhesion MoleculesEPCAM protein, humanEpithelial Cell Adhesion MoleculeCatumaxomabEpithelial cell-adhesion moleculeIntraperitoneal therapyMalignant ascitesOutpatient treatmentTrifunctional antibody

Identifiers

PMID26417039
PMCPMC4718441
OpenAlexW2146476268

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.