Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26416858›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2015

Comparison of Borate Bioactive Glass and Calcium Sulfate as Implants for the Local Delivery of Teicoplanin in the Treatment of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus-Induced Osteomyelitis in a Rabbit Model.

Wei-Tao Jia, Qiang Fu, Wen-Hai Huang, Chang-Qing Zhang, Mohamed N Rahaman

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Research Progress of Bone Grafting: A Comprehensive Review.International journal of nanomedicine · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Clinical outcomes and complications of S53P4 bioactive glass in chronic osteomyelitis and septic non-unions: a retrospective single-center study.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2024
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Gamma irradiation effectuality on the antibacterial and bioactivity behavior of multicomponent borate glasses against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA).Journal of biological inorganic chemistry : JBIC : a publication of the Society of Biological Inorganic Chemistry · 2022
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Biodegradable materials for bone defect repair.Military Medical Research · 2020
    Review
  17. [Application and research status of bioactive glass in bone repair].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2020
    Review
  18. Article
  19. A comparison of lithium-substituted phosphate and borate bioactive glasses for mineralised tissue repair.Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials · 2019
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Wei-Tao JiaDepartment of Orthopedics, Shanghai Jiaotong University Affiliated Sixth People's Hospital, Shanghai, China.
Qiang FuCorning Incorporated, Corning, New York, USA.
Wen-Hai HuangInstitute of Bioengineering and Information Technology Materials, Tongji University, Shanghai, China.
Chang-Qing ZhangDepartment of Orthopedics, Shanghai Jiaotong University Affiliated Sixth People's Hospital, Shanghai, China zhang_changqing@hotmail.com rahaman@mst.edu.
Mohamed N RahamanDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, Missouri University of Science and Technology, Rolla, Missouri, USA zhang_changqing@hotmail.com rahaman@mst.edu.
Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital · CNCorning (United States) · USMissouri University of Science and Technology · USTongji University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is growing interest in biomaterials that can cure bone infection and also regenerate bone. In this study, two groups of implants composed of 10% (wt/wt) teicoplanin (TEC)-loaded borate bioactive glass (designated TBG) or calcium sulfate (TCS) were created and evaluated for their ability to release TEC in vitro and to cure methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA)-induced osteomyelitis in a rabbit model. When immersed in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), both groups of implants provided a sustained release of TEC at a therapeutic level for up to 3 to 4 weeks while they were gradually degraded and converted to hydroxyapatite. The TBG implants showed a longer duration of TEC release and better retention of strength as a function of immersion time in PBS. Infected rabbit tibiae were treated by debridement, followed by implantation of TBG or TCS pellets or intravenous injection with TEC, or were left untreated. Evaluation at 6 weeks postimplantation showed that the animals implanted with TBG or TCS pellets had significantly lower radiological and histological scores, lower rates of MRSA-positive cultures, and lower bacterial loads than those preoperatively and those of animals treated intravenously. The level of bone regeneration was also higher in the defects treated with the TBG pellets. The results showed that local TEC delivery was more effective than intravenous administration for the treatment of MRSA-induced osteomyelitis. Borate glass has the advantages of better mechanical strength, more desirable kinetics of release of TEC, and a higher osteogenic capacity and thus could be an effective alternative to calcium sulfate for local delivery of TEC.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsBoron CompoundsCalcium SulfateDisease Models, AnimalDrug CarriersDrug ImplantsDurapatiteFemaleGlassInjections, IntralesionalMethicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureusOsteomyelitisRabbitsStaphylococcal InfectionsTeicoplaninAnti-Bacterial AgentsBoron CompoundsCalcium SulfateDrug CarriersDrug ImplantsDurapatiteTeicoplanin

Identifiers

PMID26416858
PMCPMC4649202
OpenAlexW2192890256

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.