Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26416731›Full record

ArticleNature2015

Plasticity-driven individualization of olfactory coding in mushroom body output neurons.

Toshihide Hige, Yoshinori Aso, Gerald M Rubin, Glenn C Turner

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 80 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
80citing papers in PubMed
7.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

80 citing papers in PubMed, 166 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The larvalScience advances · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. The role of learning-walk related multisensory experience in rewiring visual circuits in the desert ant brain.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2023
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Hacking brain development to test models of sensory coding.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023
    Article
  20. Olfactory coding.Current biology : CB · 2022
    Article

20 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Toshihide HigeCold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, New York 11724, USA.
Yoshinori AsoJanelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, 19700 Helix Drive, Ashburn, Virginia 20147, USA.
Gerald M RubinJanelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, 19700 Helix Drive, Ashburn, Virginia 20147, USA.
Glenn C TurnerCold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, New York 11724, USA.
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory · USHelix (United States) · USHoward Hughes Medical Institute · US

Funding

Electrophysiological Analysis of Olfactory Representations in DrosophilaR01DC010403 · NIDCD · COLD SPRING HARBOR LABORATORY · PI ALBEANU, DINU FLORENTIN · 2010 to 2016
$3.1M
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteNIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC010403NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC010403-01A1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although all sensory circuits ascend to higher brain areas where stimuli are represented in sparse, stimulus-specific activity patterns, relatively little is known about sensory coding on the descending side of neural circuits, as a network converges. In insects, mushroom bodies have been an important model system for studying sparse coding in the olfactory system, where this format is important for accurate memory formation. In Drosophila, it has recently been shown that the 2,000 Kenyon cells of the mushroom body converge onto a population of only 34 mushroom body output neurons (MBONs), which fall into 21 anatomically distinct cell types. Here we provide the first, to our knowledge, comprehensive view of olfactory representations at the fourth layer of the circuit, where we find a clear transition in the principles of sensory coding. We show that MBON tuning curves are highly correlated with one another. This is in sharp contrast to the process of progressive decorrelation of tuning in the earlier layers of the circuit. Instead, at the population level, odour representations are reformatted so that positive and negative correlations arise between representations of different odours. At the single-cell level, we show that uniquely identifiable MBONs display profoundly different tuning across different animals, but that tuning of the same neuron across the two hemispheres of an individual fly was nearly identical. Thus, individualized coordination of tuning arises at this level of the olfactory circuit. Furthermore, we find that this individualization is an active process that requires a learning-related gene, rutabaga. Ultimately, neural circuits have to flexibly map highly stimulus-specific information in sparse layers onto a limited number of different motor outputs. The reformatting of sensory representations we observe here may mark the beginning of this sensory-motor transition in the olfactory system.

Indexed as

Adenylyl CyclasesAnimalsDrosophila melanogasterDrosophila ProteinsFemaleLearningMaleMushroom BodiesMutationNeuronal PlasticityNeuronsOlfactory PathwaysOlfactory PerceptionPsychomotor PerformanceAdenylyl CyclasesDrosophila ProteinsRut protein, Drosophila

Identifiers

PMID26416731
PMCPMC4860018
OpenAlexW2221454867

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.