ArticleNature2015
Plasticity-driven individualization of olfactory coding in mushroom body output neurons.
Article in Nature, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 80 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
80 citing papers in PubMed, 166 citations in OpenAlex.
- The larvalScience advances · 2026Article
- Hunger states modulate aggression via opposing dopamine pathways.Nature communications · 2026Article
- A highly sensitive genetically encoded red cAMP sensor for multiplex imaging in vivo.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Convergence-divergence circuits for multimodal integration of innate and learned opponent valences.Frontiers in systems neuroscience · 2026Article
- Prominent involvement of acetylcholine dynamics in stable olfactory representation across the Drosophila brain.Nature communications · 2025Article
- In Vivo Imaging of Neural Activity in Unanesthetized Drosophila Adult Flies.Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE · 2025Article
- Hybrid neural networks in the mushroom body drive olfactory preference inScience advances · 2025Article
- A biological model of nonlinear dimensionality reduction.Science advances · 2025Article
- Article
- Activity of nested neural circuits drives different courtship songs in Drosophila.Nature neuroscience · 2024Article
- Article
- Active forgetting and neuropsychiatric diseases.Molecular psychiatry · 2024Review
- What do the mushroom bodies do for the insect brain? Twenty-five years of progress.Learning & memory (Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.) · 2024Article
- Neural circuit mechanisms for transforming learned olfactory valences into wind-oriented movement.eLife · 2023Article
- Input density tunes Kenyon cell sensory responses in the Drosophila mushroom body.Current biology : CB · 2023Article
- The role of learning-walk related multisensory experience in rewiring visual circuits in the desert ant brain.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2023Review
- Flexible specificity of memory ineLife · 2023Article
- The cellular architecture of memory modules ineLife · 2023Article
- Hacking brain development to test models of sensory coding.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023Article
- Olfactory coding.Current biology : CB · 2022Article
20 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Although all sensory circuits ascend to higher brain areas where stimuli are represented in sparse, stimulus-specific activity patterns, relatively little is known about sensory coding on the descending side of neural circuits, as a network converges. In insects, mushroom bodies have been an important model system for studying sparse coding in the olfactory system, where this format is important for accurate memory formation. In Drosophila, it has recently been shown that the 2,000 Kenyon cells of the mushroom body converge onto a population of only 34 mushroom body output neurons (MBONs), which fall into 21 anatomically distinct cell types. Here we provide the first, to our knowledge, comprehensive view of olfactory representations at the fourth layer of the circuit, where we find a clear transition in the principles of sensory coding. We show that MBON tuning curves are highly correlated with one another. This is in sharp contrast to the process of progressive decorrelation of tuning in the earlier layers of the circuit. Instead, at the population level, odour representations are reformatted so that positive and negative correlations arise between representations of different odours. At the single-cell level, we show that uniquely identifiable MBONs display profoundly different tuning across different animals, but that tuning of the same neuron across the two hemispheres of an individual fly was nearly identical. Thus, individualized coordination of tuning arises at this level of the olfactory circuit. Furthermore, we find that this individualization is an active process that requires a learning-related gene, rutabaga. Ultimately, neural circuits have to flexibly map highly stimulus-specific information in sparse layers onto a limited number of different motor outputs. The reformatting of sensory representations we observe here may mark the beginning of this sensory-motor transition in the olfactory system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.