ArticleBMC health services research2015
Determinants of patient-reported experience of cancer services responsiveness.
Article in BMC health services research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Patient reported outcome and experience measures among patients with central venous access devices: a systematic review.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024Pooled it
- Health system responsiveness: a systematic evidence mapping review of the global literature.International journal for equity in health · 2021Pooled it
- A systematic review of the validity and reliability of patient-reported experience measures.Health services research · 2019Pooled it
- Development and Psychometric Validation of Perioperative Patient-Reported Experience Measures for Nursing Care in Surgical Patients.Journal of nursing management · 2025Article
- Patient experiences and needs in cancer care- results from a nationwide cross-sectional study in Germany.BMC health services research · 2024Article
- Development of the Parental Experience with Care for Children with Serious Illnesses (PRECIOUS) quality of care measure.BMC palliative care · 2024Article
- Socio-demographic and health-related determinants of patients' overall rating and experiences of cancer care.BMC cancer · 2023Article
- Online Physician-Patient Interaction and Patient Satisfaction: Empirical Study of the Internet Hospital Service.Journal of medical Internet research · 2023Article
- Development and psychometric properties of the Stressors in Breast Cancer Scale.Frontiers in psychology · 2023Article
- Patients' experiences with cancer care in Switzerland: Results of a multicentre cross-sectional survey.European journal of cancer care · 2022Article
- Brain cancer patient and support persons' experiences of psychosocial care: a mapping of research outputs.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2021Review
- Patients' Satisfaction by SmileInHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Comparison of Patient-Reported Experience of Patients Receiving Radiotherapy Measured by Two Validated Surveys.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2021Article
- The patient advisor, an organizational resource as a lever for an enhanced oncology patient experience (PAROLE-onco): a longitudinal multiple case study protocol.BMC health services research · 2021Article
- Investigating the healthcare pathway through patients' experience and profiles: implications for breast cancer healthcare providers.BMC health services research · 2020Observational
- Patients' perspective on how to improve the care of people with chronic conditions in France: a citizen science study within the ComPaRe e-cohort.BMJ quality & safety · 2019Article
- Collaborative governance in the Quebec Cancer Network: a realist evaluation of emerging mechanisms of institutionalization, multi-level governance, and value creation using a longitudinal multiple case study design.BMC health services research · 2019Article
- Measuring Team Effectiveness in the Health Care Setting: An Inventory of Survey Tools.Health services insights · 2018Review
- Optimizing clinical and organizational practice in cancer survivor transitions between specialized oncology and primary care teams: a realist evaluation of multiple case studies.BMC health services research · 2017Article
- Comparison of Responsiveness Level in Iranian Public and Private Physiotherapy Clinics: a Cross-Sectional Multi-center Study.Materia socio-medica · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn coming years, patient-reported data are expected to play a more prominent role in ensuring early and efficient detection of healthcare system dysfunctions, developing interventions and evaluating their effects on health outcomes, and monitoring quality of care from the patient's perspective. The concept of responsiveness relates to patient-reported experience measures that focus on the system's response to service users' legitimate expectations. We explored this concept in an effort to address unresolved issues related to measuring and interpreting patient experience. Our objectives in this study were to report on patients' perceptions of cancer services responsiveness and to identify patient characteristics and organizational attributes that are potential determinants of a positive patient-reported experience.
methodsA cross-sectional survey was conducted of 1379 cancer patients in nine participating ambulatory cancer clinics in hospitals across the province of Quebec, Canada. They were invited to complete the Cancer Services Responsiveness tool, a 19-item questionnaire evaluating patients' perceptions of the responsiveness of cancer services. Sociodemographic data and self-reported clinical and organizational data were collected. Descriptive statistical analysis, univariate and multivariate logistic regressions were performed.
resultsThe patients surveyed generally perceived cancer services as highly responsive. The individual determinants of overall responsiveness found to be significant were self-assessed health status, age, and education level; organizational determinants were academic affiliation and geographic location of the clinic. DISCUSSION: Responsiveness refers to distinctive indicators of healthcare quality focused on patient-provider interactions and presents a complementary picture to other patient-reported experience measures. The identified determinants of patients' positive experience with cancer services provide valuable information to guide care providers in targeting quality improvements.
conclusionsFinally, our results suggest these determinants should be further studied to eliminate confounders and produce usable results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.