Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26416229›Full record

ArticleMalaria journal2015

The challenges of introducing routine G6PD testing into radical cure: a workshop report.

Benedikt Ley, Nick Luter, Fe Esperanza Espino, Angela Devine, Michael Kalnoky, Yoel Lubell, Kamala Thriemer, J Kevin Baird, Eugenie Poirot, Nolwenn Conan and 10 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Malaria journal, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
12.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 80 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Provider and household costs ofBulletin of the World Health Organization · 2019
    Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 13 institutions in 9 countries.

Benedikt LeyGlobal and Tropical Health Division, Menzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University, PO Box 41096, Casuarina, Darwin, NT, 0811, Australia. benedikt.ley@menzies.edu.au.
Nick LuterPATH, Diagnostics Program, Seattle, WA, USA. nluter@path.org.
Fe Esperanza EspinoResearch Institute of Tropical Medicine, Manila, Philippines. fe.espino2012@gmail.com.
Angela DevineMahidol-Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand. Angela@tropmedres.ac.
Michael KalnokyPATH, Diagnostics Program, Seattle, WA, USA. mkalnoky@path.org.
Yoel LubellResearch Institute of Tropical Medicine, Manila, Philippines. yoel@tropmedres.ac.
Kamala ThriemerGlobal and Tropical Health Division, Menzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University, PO Box 41096, Casuarina, Darwin, NT, 0811, Australia. kamala.ley-thriemer@menzies.edu.au.
J Kevin BairdEijkman-Oxford Clinical Research Unit, Jakarta, Indonesia. jkevinbaird@yahoo.com.
Eugenie PoirotThe Malaria Elimination Initiative, Global Health Group, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA. eugenie.poirot@ucsf.edu.
Nolwenn ConanMalaria Consortium, Bangkok, Thailand. n.conan@malariaconsortium.org.
Chong Chee KheongDisease Control Division, Ministry of Health Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. drchongck@moh.gov.my.
Lek DysoleyNational Center for Parasitology Entomology and Malaria Control, Phnom Penh, Cambodia. soleycnm@gmail.com.
Wasif Ali KhanInternational Center for Diarrheal Disease Research, Bangladesh (icddr, b), Dhaka, Bangladesh. wakhan@icddrb.org.
April G Dion-BerbosoNewborn Screening Center, Institute of Human Genetics, National Institutes of Health, University of the Philippines, Manila, Philippines. agberboso@post.upm.edu.ph.
Germana BanconeShoklo Malaria Research Unit, Mae Sot, Tak Province, Thailand. germana@tropmedres.ac.
Jimee HwangThe Malaria Elimination Initiative, Global Health Group, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA. Jimee.Hwang@ucsf.edu.
Ritu KumarPATH, Diagnostics Program, Seattle, WA, USA. rikumar@path.org.
Ric N PriceGlobal and Tropical Health Division, Menzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University, PO Box 41096, Casuarina, Darwin, NT, 0811, Australia. ricprice99@gmail.com.
Lorenz von SeidleinMahidol-Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand. lorenz@tropmedres.ac.
Gonzalo J DomingoPATH, Diagnostics Program, Seattle, WA, USA. gdomingo@path.org.
Program for Appropriate Technology in Health · USResearch Institute for Tropical Medicine · PHUniversity of California, San Francisco · USUniversity of Oxford · GBCambodia National Malaria Center · KHCharles Darwin University · AUEijkman Institute for Molecular Biology · IDInternational Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research · BDMahidol University · THMenzies School of Health Research · AUMinistry of Health · MYShoklo Malaria Research Unit · THUniversity of the Philippines Manila · PH

Funding

Wellcome Trust 089276Wellcome Trust 091625
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The only currently available drug that effectively removes malaria hypnozoites from the human host is primaquine. The use of 8-aminoquinolines is hampered by haemolytic side effects in glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) deficient individuals. Recently a number of qualitative and a quantitative rapid diagnostic test (RDT) format have been developed that provide an alternative to the current standard G6PD activity assays. The WHO has recently recommended routine testing of G6PD status prior to primaquine radical cure whenever possible. A workshop was held in the Philippines in early 2015 to discuss key challenges and knowledge gaps that hinder the introduction of routine G6PD testing. Two point-of-care (PoC) test formats for the measurement of G6PD activity are currently available: qualitative tests comparable to malaria RDT as well as biosensors that provide a quantitative reading. Qualitative G6PD PoC tests provide a binomial test result, are easy to use and some products are comparable in price to the widely used fluorescent spot test. Qualitative test results can accurately classify hemizygous males, heterozygous females, but may misclassify females with intermediate G6PD activity. Biosensors provide a more complex quantitative readout and are better suited to identify heterozygous females. While associated with higher costs per sample tested biosensors have the potential for broader use in other scenarios where knowledge of G6PD activity is relevant as well. The introduction of routine G6PD testing is associated with additional costs on top of routine treatment that will vary by setting and will need to be assessed prior to test introduction. Reliable G6PD PoC tests have the potential to play an essential role in future malaria elimination programmes, however require an improved understanding on how to best integrate routine G6PD testing into different health settings.

Indexed as

AntimalarialsFemaleGlucosephosphate DehydrogenaseGlucosephosphate Dehydrogenase DeficiencyHumansMalaria, VivaxMalePlasmodium vivaxPoint-of-Care SystemsPrimaquineAntimalarialsGlucosephosphate DehydrogenasePrimaquine

Identifiers

PMID26416229
PMCPMC4587750
OpenAlexW2154179758

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.