Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26416195›Full record

Trial reportThe American journal of gastroenterology2015

Right Or Left in COLonoscopy (ROLCOL)? A Randomized Controlled Trial of Right- versus Left-Sided Starting Position in Colonoscopy.

N Vergis, A K McGrath, C H Stoddart, Jonathan M Hoare

3 registry-linked trialsAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in The American journal of gastroenterology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03337217 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2017, after this paper: background citation

Colonoscopy in the Prone Position for Patients With BMI Greater Than 30 Is Superior to Standard Left Lateral Decubitus Position

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of VirginiaRan2017 to 2019Enrolled141ConditionsObesityArmsPosition during colonoscopy
NCT03355495 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Right vs Left Lateral Decubitus Positioning on Outcomes in Colonoscopy

TypeinterventionalSponsorMemorial University of NewfoundlandRan2019 to 2023Enrolled172ConditionsColonic Adenoma, Colonic CancerArmsColonoscopy - Position Change
NCT06664762 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Left Lateral Position Versus Supine Position in Colonoscopy, a Multicenter Single-blind Randomized Clinical Trial Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorHospital Civil de GuadalajaraRan2024 to 2025Enrolled144ConditionsColorectal Cancer ScreeningArmsLeft lateral position intervention, Supine position intervention
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. The Effects of Positioning During Colonoscopy on Efficacy and Post-procedure Comfort.The Turkish journal of gastroenterology : the official journal of Turkish Society of Gastroenterology · 2025
    Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Painless colonoscopy: fact or fiction?Clinical endoscopy · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Position Change in Colonoscopy-A Turn for the Better?The American journal of gastroenterology · 2016
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Reply to Koklu et al.The American journal of gastroenterology · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

N VergisDepartment of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College, St Mary's Hospital, London, UK.
A K McGrathDepartment of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College, St Mary's Hospital, London, UK.
C H StoddartDepartment of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College, St Mary's Hospital, London, UK.
Jonathan M HoareDepartment of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College, St Mary's Hospital, London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesColonoscopy is technically challenging and can cause discomfort for patients. We aimed to test whether right-sided starting position for colonoscopy would result in shorter procedure time and greater patient comfort when compared with conventional left-sided starting position.

methodsWe conducted a randomized controlled trial in which patients were randomized to begin in either the right- (RL) or conventional left-lateral (LL) position. One hundred and sixty-three adult patients undergoing scheduled colonoscopy were stratified by age, gender, body mass index, and experience of the endoscopist. Patients were then randomized 1:1 in permuted blocks. The primary outcome measure was time to cecal intubation and secondary outcome measures included patient comfort that was evaluated by visual analog comfort scale.

resultsMedian time to reach the cecum was quicker when colonoscopy began with patients positioned RL rather than LL (P=0.0078). Moreover, patients found RL more comfortable than LL (P=0.02). Multiple linear regression confirmed starting position in colonoscopy as an independent determinant of time to reach the cecum (P=0.007). Women and those who had previously undergone abdominal surgery gained the greatest benefit from right-sided positioning (RL vs. LL: 498 vs. 824 s; P=0.03 and 498 vs. 797 s; P=0.006, respectively).

conclusionsOur study reveals that right-sided positioning at the start of colonoscopy results in more comfortable and quicker procedures. Of the factors identified by multiple linear regression to independently have an impact on time to reach the cecum, only starting position is modifiable. Right-sided starting position may therefore be of benefit in colonoscopy, in particular for women and patients who have previously undergone abdominal surgery.

Indexed as

Patient PositioningPatient PreferenceCecumColonoscopyFemaleHumansIntubationMaleMiddle AgedPainPain MeasurementSex FactorsTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID26416195

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.