Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26416161›Full record

ArticleHuman brain mapping2015

Neural responses to kindness and malevolence differ in illness and recovery in women with anorexia nervosa.

Carrie J McAdams, Terry Lohrenz, P Read Montague

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human brain mapping, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Interpersonal attribution bias and social evaluation in adolescent eating disorders.European eating disorders review : the journal of the Eating Disorders Association · 2023
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Neural processes related to negative self-concept in adult and adolescent anorexia nervosa.European eating disorders review : the journal of the Eating Disorders Association · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Carrie J McAdamsDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Texas at Southwestern Medical School, Dallas, Texas.
Terry LohrenzVirginia Tech Carilion Research Institute, Virginia Tech, Roanoke, Virginia.
P Read MontagueVirginia Tech Carilion Research Institute, Virginia Tech, Roanoke, Virginia.
Carilion Clinic · USTexas Health Dallas · USUniversity College London · GB

Funding

COMPUTATIONAL SUBSTRATES OF ADDICTION AND REWARDR01DA011723 · NIDA · VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INST AND ST UNIV · PI MONTAGUE, P READ · 1998 to 2013
$3.6M
Neurobiology of Social Thinking in AnorexiaK23MH093684 · NIMH · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI MCADAMS, CARRIE JUSTINE · 2012 to 2016
$858k
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA011723NIMH NIH HHS K23 MH093684Wellcome Trust 091188Wellcome Trust 091593
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In anorexia nervosa, problems with social relationships contribute to illness, and improvements in social support are associated with recovery. Using the multiround trust game and 3T MRI, we compare neural responses in a social relationship in three groups of women: women with anorexia nervosa, women in long-term weight recovery from anorexia nervosa, and healthy comparison women. Surrogate markers related to social signals in the game were computed each round to assess whether the relationship was improving (benevolence) or deteriorating (malevolence) for each subject. Compared with healthy women, neural responses to benevolence were diminished in the precuneus and right angular gyrus in both currently-ill and weight-recovered subjects with anorexia, but neural responses to malevolence differed in the left fusiform only in currently-ill subjects. Next, using a whole-brain regression, we identified an office assessment, the positive personalizing bias, that was inversely correlated with neural activity in the occipital lobe, the precuneus and posterior cingulate, the bilateral temporoparietal junctions, and dorsal anterior cingulate, during benevolence for all groups of subjects. The positive personalizing bias is a self-report measure that assesses the degree with which a person attributes positive experiences to other people. These data suggest that problems in perceiving kindness may be a consistent trait related to the development of anorexia nervosa, whereas recognizing malevolence may be related to recovery. Future work on social brain function, in both healthy and psychiatric populations, should consider positive personalizing biases as a possible marker of neural differences related to kindness perception.

Indexed as

Anorexia NervosaBeneficenceBrain MappingInterpersonal RelationsAdolescentAdultAnalysis of VarianceBrainFemaleGames, ExperimentalHumansImaging, Three-DimensionalIntelligence TestsMagnetic Resonance ImagingMiddle AgedRecovery of Functiondefault mode networkeating disordersfMRIneuroeconomicsocial cognition

Identifiers

PMID26416161
PMCPMC4715806
OpenAlexW2101834676

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.