Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26416154›Full record

Trial reportJournal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV2015

Brimonidine gel 0.33% rapidly improves patient-reported outcomes by controlling facial erythema of rosacea: a randomized, double-blind, vehicle-controlled study.

A M Layton, M Schaller, B Homey, M A Hofmann, A P Bewley, P Lehmann, C Nohlgård, D B Sarwer, N Kerrouche, Y M Ma

Abstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. [Rosacea-the updated S2k guideline].Dermatologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2023
    Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Rosacea in Patients with Skin of Color: Diagnosis and Management.American journal of clinical dermatology · 2026
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

A M LaytonHarrogate and District NHS Foundation Trust, Harrogate, UK.
M SchallerDepartment of Dermatology, Tübingen University Hospital, Tübingen, Germany.
B HomeyDepartment of Dermatology, Medical Faculty, University of Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
M A HofmannDepartment of Dermatology, Venerology and Allergology, Charité Medical School, Berlin, Germany.
A P BewleyWhipps Cross University Hospital and the Royal London Hospital, London, UK.
P LehmannCenter for Dermatology, Allergology, and Surgical Dermatology, Helios Clinic Wuppertal, Wuppertal, Germany.
C NohlgårdLäkarhuset Odenplan, Stockholm, Sweden.
D B SarwerDepartments of Psychiatry and Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
N KerroucheGalderma R&D SNC, Sophia Antipolis, France.
Y M MaGalderma R&D SNC, Sophia Antipolis, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFacial redness contributes to impaired psychosocial functioning in rosacea patients and the only approved treatment for erythema is topical brimonidine gel 0.33%.

objectivesTo evaluate patient-reported outcomes, as well as efficacy and safety, in subjects with self-perceived severe erythema treated with brimonidine gel 0.33% compared to vehicle.

methodsAn 8-day multicenter, randomized study comparing once-daily brimonidine gel 0.33% with vehicle gel using a facial redness questionnaire, subject satisfaction questionnaire and a patient diary of facial redness control to assess patient-reported outcomes.

resultsOf the 92 included subjects with self-perceived severe erythema, very few were satisfied with their appearance at baseline (4.2% brimonidine group, 0 vehicle group). On Day 8, significantly more brimonidine group subjects were satisfied with their facial appearance compared to vehicle group (36.9% vs. 21.5%; P < 0.05), with the overall treatment effect (69.6% vs. 40.4%; P < 0.01), and with the improvement in their facial redness (67.4% vs. 33.3%; P < 0.001). More brimonidine group subjects were able to control their facial redness daily (e.g. 83.0% vs. 38.9% on Day 1). On Day 8, significantly more brimonidine group subjects than vehicle group had at least a one-grade improvement from baseline in the Clinician Erythema Assessment score (71.7% vs. 35.7%; P = 0.0011) and Patient Self-Assessment score (76.1% vs. 47.6%; P = 0.004). More subjects in the brimonidine group (29.2%) reported treatment-related adverse events than in the vehicle group (15.9%) but most were mild and transient.

conclusionsOnce-daily brimonidine gel 0.33% allowed patients to rapidly control their facial redness and significantly improved patient-reported outcomes in the treatment of persistent facial erythema of rosacea.

Indexed as

Adrenergic alpha-2 Receptor AgonistsAdultAgedBrimonidine TartrateErythemaFacial DermatosesFemaleGelsHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient SatisfactionRosaceaSeverity of Illness IndexSurveys and QuestionnairesTreatment OutcomeAdrenergic alpha-2 Receptor AgonistsBrimonidine TartrateGels

Identifiers

PMID26416154
PMCPMC5054962

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.