Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26416127›Full record

Trial reportAnnals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine2016

Mammography Adherence in African-American Women: Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Wambui G Gathirua-Mwangi, Patrick O Monahan, Timothy Stump, Susan M Rawl, Celette Sugg Skinner, Victoria L Champion

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Access to Care as a Barrier to Mammography for Black Women.Policy, politics & nursing practice · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Wambui G Gathirua-MwangiDepartment of Epidemiology, Richard M. Fairbanks School of Public Health, Indiana University, 714 N Senate Avenue, Suite EF 209, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA. ggathiru@iupui.edu.
Patrick O MonahanDepartment of Epidemiology, Richard M. Fairbanks School of Public Health, Indiana University, 714 N Senate Avenue, Suite EF 209, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA.
Timothy StumpDepartment of Biostatistics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Susan M RawlIndiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Celette Sugg SkinnerUniversity of Texas Southwestern Harold C Simmons Cancer Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
Victoria L ChampionIndiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN, USA.

Funding

UT Southwestern Center for Translational Medicine (UL1/KL2/TL1)UL1TR001105 · NCATS · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI TOTO, ROBERT DANIEL · 2013 to 2017
$24.5M
Indiana Clinical and Translational Sciences InstituteUL1TR001108 · NCATS · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI DENNE, SCOTT C., SHEKHAR, ANANTHA · 2013 to 2017
$23.3M
Training in Research for Behavioral Oncology and Cancer Control ProgramR25CA117865 · NCI · INDIANA UNIV-PURDUE UNIV AT INDIANAPOLIS · PI CHAMPION, VICTORIA LEE · 2006 to 2015
$4.1M
Promoting Breast Cancer Screening Via Computer V PhoneR01NR008434 · NINR · INDIANA UNIV-PURDUE UNIV AT INDIANAPOLIS · PI CHAMPION, VICTORIA LEE · 2004 to 2008
$2.6M
Interdisciplinary Training in Cancer Prevention and ControlT32CA117865 · NCI · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI Victoria Lee Champion, Catherine E Mosher · 2016 to 2026
$2.4M
Research and Training for Behavioral Oncology InterventionsK05CA175048 · NCI · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI CHAMPION, VICTORIA LEE · 2014 to 2018
$484k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001105NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001108NCI NIH HHS K05 CA175048NCI NIH HHS K05CA175048NCI NIH HHS R25 CA117865NCI NIH HHS R25 CA117865-07S1NCI NIH HHS T32 CA117865NINR NIH HHS R01 NR008434
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBreast cancer is the second leading cause of cancer mortality among women in the developed world. Mammography screening is especially important for African-Americans because they experience a greater mortality (OR = 1.38) than Caucasians despite having a lower incidence of breast cancer. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of two interventions with usual care on mammography adherence among African-American women.

methodsA subsample of African-American women (n = 244) aged 41-65 years who had not had a mammogram in the last 15 months and no history of breast cancer was randomly assigned to receive (1) mailed interactive DVD, (2) computer-tailored telephone counseling, or (3) usual care.

resultsThe DVD intervention was five times more effective than usual care for promoting mammography screening at 6 months follow-up among women who earned less than $30,000 (OR = 5.3). Compared to usual care, neither the DVD nor phone produced significant effects for women with household incomes >$30,000.

conclusionUse of a mailed DVD for low-income African-American women may be an effective way to increase mammography adherence.

Indexed as

CounselingVideo RecordingAdultAgedBlack or African AmericanBreast NeoplasmsFemaleHealth EducationHumansMammographyMiddle AgedTelephoneAfrican-AmericanControlled trialHealth disparitiesInteractive DVDMammography adherenceRandomized intervention

Identifiers

PMID26416127
PMCPMC4744150

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.