Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26415961›Full record

ArticleImplementation science : IS2015

Using realist review to inform intervention development: methodological illustration and conceptual platform for collaborative care in offender mental health.

M Pearson, S L Brand, C Quinn, J Shaw, M Maguire, S Michie, S Briscoe, C Lennox, A Stirzaker, T Kirkpatrick and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Implementation science : IS, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 63 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
63citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
18.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

63 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 110 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Patient-reported outcome use in oncology: a systematic review of the impact on patient-clinician communication.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2018
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review

3 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

M PearsonCollaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care (CLAHRC) for the South West Peninsula, University of Exeter Medical School, South Cloisters, St Luke's Campus, Exeter, EX1 2LU, UK. Mark.Pearson@exeter.ac.uk.
S L BrandCentre for Clinical Trials and Health Research, Plymouth University Peninsula Schools of Medicine and Dentistry, ITTC Building, Davy Road, Plymouth Science Park, Plymouth, PL6 8BX, UK. sarah.brand@plymouth.ac.uk.
C QuinnCentre for Clinical Trials and Health Research, Plymouth University Peninsula Schools of Medicine and Dentistry, ITTC Building, Davy Road, Plymouth Science Park, Plymouth, PL6 8BX, UK. cath.quinn@plymouth.ac.uk.
J ShawInstitute of Brain, Behaviour and Mental Health, Jean McFarlane Building, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK. jennifer.j.shaw@manchester.ac.uk.
M MaguireCentre for Criminology, University of South Wales, Pontypridd, CF37 1DL, UK. mike.maguire@southwales.ac.uk.
S MichieUCL Centre for Behaviour Change, University College London, 1-19 Torrington Place, London, WC1E 7HB, UK. s.michie@ucl.ac.uk.
S BriscoeCollaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care (CLAHRC) for the South West Peninsula, University of Exeter Medical School, South Cloisters, St Luke's Campus, Exeter, EX1 2LU, UK. S.Briscoe@exeter.ac.uk.
C LennoxInstitute of Brain, Behaviour and Mental Health, Jean McFarlane Building, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK. charlotte.lennox@manchester.ac.uk.
A StirzakerAvon & Wiltshire Mental Health Partnership Trust, Old Town Surgery, Curie Avenue, Swindon, SN1 4GB, UK. alex.stirzaker@nhs.net.
T KirkpatrickCentre for Clinical Trials and Health Research, Plymouth University Peninsula Schools of Medicine and Dentistry, ITTC Building, Davy Road, Plymouth Science Park, Plymouth, PL6 8BX, UK. tim.kirkpatrick@plymouth.ac.uk.
R ByngCentre for Clinical Trials and Health Research, Plymouth University Peninsula Schools of Medicine and Dentistry, ITTC Building, Davy Road, Plymouth Science Park, Plymouth, PL6 8BX, UK. richard.byng@plymouth.ac.uk.
University of Plymouth · GBUniversity of Exeter · GBUniversity of Manchester · GBAvon and Wiltshire Mental Health Partnership NHS Trust · GBUniversity College London · GBUniversity of South Wales · GB

Funding

Department of Health RP-DG-1108-10043Department of Health RP-PG-1210-12011
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis paper reports how we used a realist review, as part of a wider project to improve collaborative mental health care for prisoners with common mental health problems, to develop a conceptual platform. The importance of offenders gaining support for their mental health, and the need for practitioners across the health service, the criminal justice system, and the third sector to work together to achieve this is recognised internationally. However, the literature does not provide coherent analyses of how these ambitions can be achieved. This paper demonstrates how a realist review can be applied to inform complex intervention development that spans different locations, organisations, professions, and care sectors.

methodsWe applied and developed a realist review for the purposes of intervention development, using a three-stage process. (1) An iterative database search strategy (extending beyond criminal justice and offender health) and groups of academics, practitioners, and people with lived experience were used to identify explanatory accounts (n = 347). (2) From these accounts, we developed consolidated explanatory accounts (n = 75). (3) The identified interactions between practitioners and offenders (within their organisational, social, and cultural contexts) were specified in a conceptual platform. We also specify, step by step, how these explanatory accounts were documented, consolidated, and built into a conceptual platform. This addresses an important methodological gap for social scientists and intervention developers about how to develop and articulate programme and implementation theory underpinning complex interventions.

resultsAn integrated person-centred system is proposed to improve collaborative mental health care for offenders with common mental health problems (near to and after release) by achieving consistency between the goals of different sectors and practitioners, enabling practitioners to apply scientific and experiential knowledge in working judiciously and reflectively, and building systems and aligning resources that are centred on offenders' health and social care needs.

conclusionsAs part of a broader programme of work, a realist review can make an important contribution to the specification of theoretically informed interventions that have the potential to improve health outcomes. Our conceptual platform has potential application in related systems of health and social care where integrated, and person-centred care is a goal.

Indexed as

Cooperative BehaviorMental HealthContinuity of Patient CareCriminalsHumansInterpersonal RelationsPatient-Centered CarePrisonsQualitative ResearchReferral and ConsultationSocial Work

Identifiers

PMID26415961
PMCPMC4584430
OpenAlexW2145124183

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.