Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26415932›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2015

A survey of perceived training differences between ophthalmology residents in Hong Kong and China.

Alvin L Young, Vishal Jhanji, Yuanbo Liang, Nathan Congdon, Simon Chow, Fenghua Wang, Xiujuan Zhang, Xiaofei Man, Mingming Yang, Zhong Lin and 2 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03458442 (China OLIMPICS), which is not on this map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03458442 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

China OLIMPICS: China Ophthalmic Learning and Improvement Initiative in Cataract Surgery Trial, an Education-Intervention Randomized Control Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorSun Yat-sen UniversityRan2018 to 2020Enrolled32ConditionsCataractArmsSimulation-based surgical training, Standard surgical training
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Alvin L YoungDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Prince of Wales Hospital, Hong Kong SAR, Hong Kong. youngla@ha.org.hk.
Vishal JhanjiDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Prince of Wales Hospital, Hong Kong SAR, Hong Kong. vishaljhanji@cuhk.edu.hk.
Yuanbo LiangDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, Hong Kong. yuanboliang@126.com.
Nathan CongdonZhongshan Ophthamic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China. ncongdon1@gmail.com.
Simon ChowDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, Hong Kong. wwjdsimon@gmail.com.
Fenghua WangBeijing Tongren Eye Center, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University; Beijing Ophthalmology & Visual Science Key Lab, Beijing, China. handanwfh@163.com.
Xiujuan ZhangDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, Hong Kong. zhangxiujuan_pv@yahoo.com.cn.
Xiaofei ManDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, Hong Kong. sophiemoon.hk@gmail.com.
Mingming YangDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, Hong Kong. mmyang@cuhk.edu.hk.
Zhong LinDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Prince of Wales Hospital, Hong Kong SAR, Hong Kong. linzhong_@126.com.
Hunter G L YuenZhongshan Ophthamic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China. hunterklyuen@gmail.com.
Dennis S C LamHong Kong Eye Hospital, Hong Kong SAR, Hong Kong. dlam.sklo.sysu.cn@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo study the differences in ophthalmology resident training between China and the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (HKSAR).

methodsTraining programs were selected from among the largest and best-known teaching hospitals. Ophthalmology residents were sent an anonymous 48-item questionnaire by mail. Work satisfaction, time allocation between training activities and volume of surgery performed were determined.

results50/75 residents (66.7 %) from China and 20/26 (76.9 %) from HKSAR completed the survey. Age (28.9 ± 2.5 vs. 30.2 ± 2.9 years, p = 0.15) and number of years in training (3.4 ± 1.6 vs. 2.8 ± 1.5, p = 0.19) were comparable between groups. The number of cataract procedures performed by HKSAR trainees (extra-capsular, median 80.0, quartile range: 30.0, 100.0; phacoemulsification, median: 20.0, quartile range: 0.0, 100.0) exceeded that for Chinese residents (extra-capsular: median = 0, p < 0.0001; phacoemulsification: median = 0, p < 0.0001). Chinese trainees spent more time completing medical charts (>50 % of time on charts: 62.5 % versus 5.3 %, p < 0.0001) and received less supervision (≥90 % of training supervised: 4.4 % versus 65 %, p < 0.0001). Chinese residents were more likely to feel underpaid (96.0 % vs. 31.6 %, p < 0.0001) and hoped their children would not practice medicine (69.4 % vs. 5.0 %, p = 0.0001) compared HKSAR residents.

conclusionsIn this study, ophthalmology residents in China report strikingly less surgical experience and supervision, and lower satisfaction than HKSAR residents. The HKSAR model of hands-on resident training might be useful in improving the low cataract surgical rate in China.

Indexed as

AdultBiomedical ResearchChinaEye DiseasesFemaleHong KongHumansInternship and ResidencyMaleOphthalmologyProgram EvaluationSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID26415932
PMCPMC4587816

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.