Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26415919›Full record

ReviewEpilepsia2015

Epilepsy priorities in Europe: A report of the ILAE-IBE Epilepsy Advocacy Europe Task Force.

Michel Baulac, Hanneke de Boer, Christian Elger, Mike Glynn, Reetta Kälviäinen, Ann Little, Janet Mifsud, Emilio Perucca, Asla Pitkänen, Philippe Ryvlin

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Epilepsia, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
6.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 97 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. [BMC neurology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. The JAK-STAT Signaling Pathway in Epilepsy.Current neuropharmacology · 2023
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Reactive Glia Inflammatory Signaling Pathways and Epilepsy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 8 institutions in 8 countries.

Michel BaulacNeurology Department and ICM-A-IHU, Salpêtrière Hospital, Paris, France.
Hanneke de BoerSEIN - Epilepsy Institute in the Netherlands, Heemstede, The Netherlands.
Christian ElgerDepartment of Epileptology, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Mike GlynnEpilepsy Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.
Reetta KälviäinenKuopio Epilepsy Center, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland.
Ann LittleInternational Bureau for Epilepsy, Dublin, Ireland.
Janet MifsudDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, The University of Malta, Msida, Malta.
Emilio PeruccaDepartment of Internal Medicine and Therapeutics, C. Mondino National Neurological Institute, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.
Asla PitkänenDepartment of Neurology, A.I. Virtanen Institute for Molecular Sciences, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.
Philippe RyvlinDepartment of Clinical Neurosciences, CHUV, Lausanne, Switzerland.
University of Eastern Finland · FIEpilepsy Ireland · IESorbonne Université · FRStichting Epilepsie Instellingen Nederland · NLUniversity Hospital of Lausanne · CHUniversity of Bonn · DEUniversity of Malta · MTUniversity of Pavia · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The European Forum on Epilepsy Research (ERF2013), which took place in Dublin, Ireland, on May 26-29, 2013, was designed to appraise epilepsy research priorities in Europe through consultation with clinical and basic scientists as well as representatives of lay organizations and health care providers. The ultimate goal was to provide a platform to improve the lives of persons with epilepsy by influencing the political agenda of the EU. The Forum highlighted the epidemiologic, medical, and social importance of epilepsy in Europe, and addressed three separate but closely related concepts. First, possibilities were explored as to how the stigma and social burden associated with epilepsy could be reduced through targeted initiatives at EU national and regional levels. Second, ways to ensure optimal standards of care throughout Europe were specifically discussed. Finally, a need for further funding in epilepsy research within the European Horizon 2020 funding programme was communicated to politicians and policymakers participating to the forum. Research topics discussed specifically included (1) epilepsy in the developing brain; (2) novel targets for innovative diagnostics and treatment of epilepsy; (3) what is required for prevention and cure of epilepsy; and (4) epilepsy and comorbidities, with a special focus on aging and mental health. This report provides a summary of recommendations that emerged at ERF2013 about how to (1) strengthen epilepsy research, (2) reduce the treatment gap, and (3) reduce the burden and stigma associated with epilepsy. Half of the 6 million European citizens with epilepsy feel stigmatized and experience social exclusion, stressing the need for funding trans-European awareness campaigns and monitoring their impact on stigma, in line with the global commitment of the European Commission and with the recommendations made in the 2011 Written Declaration on Epilepsy. Epilepsy care has high rates of misdiagnosis and considerable variability in organization and quality across European countries, translating into huge societal cost (0.2% GDP) and stressing the need for cost-effective programs of harmonization and optimization of epilepsy care throughout Europe. There is currently no cure or prevention for epilepsy, and 30% of affected persons are not controlled by current treatments, stressing the need for pursuing research efforts in the field within Horizon 2020. Priorities should include (1) development of innovative biomarkers and therapeutic targets and strategies, from gene and cell-based therapies to technologically advanced surgical treatment; (2) addressing issues raised by pediatric and aging populations, as well as by specific etiologies and comorbidities such as traumatic brain injury (TBI) and cognitive dysfunction, toward more personalized medicine and prevention; and (3) translational studies and clinical trials built upon well-established European consortia.

Indexed as

Advisory CommitteesHealth PolicyInternationalityResearch ReportBiomedical ResearchBrainCongresses as TopicEpilepsyEuropeHumansAdvocacyBiomarkersCureEpilepsyEpileptogenesisEuropean CommissionHorizon 2020ResearchTreatment

Identifiers

PMID26415919
PMCPMC5019256
OpenAlexW2128108343

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.