Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26415058›Full record

Trial reportPsychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors2015

Parental involvement in brief interventions for adolescent marijuana use.

Timothy F Piehler, Ken C Winters

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Psychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Decision-making style and response to parental involvement in brief interventions for adolescent substance use.Journal of family psychology : JFP : journal of the Division of Family Psychology of the American Psychological Association (Division 43) · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Timothy F PiehlerDepartment of Family Social Science.
Ken C WintersDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Minnesota Medical School.

Funding

Scientific CoreP50DA027841 · NIDA · TREATMENT RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI CACCIOLA, JOHN S · 2010 to 2014
$10.7M
Brief Intervention for Alcohol Abusing StudentsR01AA014866 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES · PI WINTERS, KEN C · 2005 to 2007
$706k
Brief Intervention for Drug Abusing StudentsR01DA017492 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES · PI WINTERS, KEN C · 2003 to 2005
$668k
Adaptive Intervention Strategies: Advancing Research and Career DevelopmentK24DA035882 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI WINTERS, KEN C · 2013 to 2014
$331k
NIAAA NIH HHS AA14866NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA014866NIDA NIH HHS DA017492NIDA NIH HHS DA027841NIDA NIH HHS DA035882NIDA NIH HHS K24 DA035882NIDA NIH HHS P50 DA027841NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA017492
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Adolescents (aged 12-18 years) identified in a school setting as abusing marijuana and other drugs were randomly assigned to complete 1 of 2 brief interventions (BIs). Adolescents and their parent (N = 259) were randomly assigned to receive either a 2-session adolescent only (BI-A) or a 2-session adolescent and additional parent session (BI-AP). Interventions were manualized and delivered in a school setting by trained counselors. Adolescents were assessed at intake and at 6 months following the completion of the intervention. Using a latent construct representing 6-month marijuana use outcomes, current findings supported previous research that BI-AP resulted in superior outcomes when compared to BI-A. The presence of a marijuana dependence diagnosis at baseline predicted poorer outcomes when compared to youth without a diagnosis. Both baseline diagnostic status and co-occurring conduct problems interacted with intervention condition in predicting marijuana use outcomes. A marijuana dependence diagnosis resulted in poorer marijuana use outcomes within the BI-A condition when compared to BI-AP. Co-occurring conduct problems were associated with poorer marijuana use outcomes within the BI-AP intervention when compared to BI-A. Implications for implementing BIs given diagnostic status, parent involvement, and co-occurring conduct problems are discussed.

Indexed as

ParentsAdolescentComorbidityConduct DisorderFamily TherapyFemaleHumansMaleMarijuana AbusePsychotherapy, BriefTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID26415058
PMCPMC4588068

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.