Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26415055›Full record

ArticlePsychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors2015

Temporal variation in facilitator and client behavior during group motivational interviewing sessions.

Jon M Houck, Sarah B Hunter, Jennifer G Benson, Linda L Cochrum, Lauren N Rowell, Elizabeth J D'Amico

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Group motivational interviewing for homeless young adults: Associations of change talk with substance use and sexual risk behavior.Psychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors · 2017
    Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jon M HouckCenter on Alcoholism, Substance Abuse, and Addictions, University of New Mexico.
Sarah B HunterRAND Corporation.
Jennifer G BensonCenter on Alcoholism, Substance Abuse, and Addictions, University of New Mexico.
Linda L CochrumCenter on Alcoholism, Substance Abuse, and Addictions, University of New Mexico.
Lauren N RowellCenter on Alcoholism, Substance Abuse, and Addictions, University of New Mexico.
Elizabeth J D'AmicoRAND Corporation.
University of New Mexico · USRAND Corporation · US

Funding

BRIEF SUBSTANCE USE INTERVENTION FOR YOUTH IN TEEN COURTR01DA019938 · NIDA · RAND CORPORATION · PI D'AMICO, ELIZABETH J. · 2007 to 2011
$2.6M
Imaging Brain Activity in Substance Use TreatmentK01AA021431 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO · PI HOUCK, JON M. · 2013 to 2017
$837k
Change Talk in a Group Setting with At-Risk AdolescentsR21AA020546 · NIAAA · RAND CORPORATION · PI D'AMICO, ELIZABETH J. · 2012 to 2013
$377k
The Effects of Client Change Talk on Risky Sexual BehaviorR03DA035690 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO · PI HOUCK, JON M. · 2013 to 2014
$312k
NIAAA NIH HHS K01 AA021431NIAAA NIH HHS K01AA021431NIAAA NIH HHS R21 AA020546NIAAA NIH HHS R21AA020546NIDA NIH HHS L30 DA034353NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA019938NIDA NIH HHS R01DA019938NIDA NIH HHS R03 DA035690NIDA NIH HHS R03DA035690
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is considerable evidence for motivational interviewing (MI) in changing problematic behaviors. Research on the causal chain for MI suggests influence of facilitator speech on client speech. This association has been examined using macro (session-level) and micro (utterance-level) measures; however, effects across sessions have largely been unexplored, particularly with groups. We evaluated a sample of 129 adolescent Group MI sessions, using a behavioral coding system and timing information to generate information on facilitator and client speech (CT; change talk) within 5 successive segments (quintiles) of each group session. We hypothesized that facilitator speech (open-ended questions and reflections of CT) would be related to subsequent CT. Repeated measures analysis indicated significant quadratic and cubic trends for facilitator and client speech across quintiles. Across quintiles, cross-lagged panel analysis using a zero-inflated negative binomial model showed minimal evidence of facilitator speech on client CT, but did indicate several effects of client CT on facilitator speech, and of client CT on subsequent client CT. Results suggest that session-level effects of facilitator speech on client speech do not arise from long-duration effects of facilitator speech; instead, we detected effects of facilitator speech on client speech only at the beginning and end of sessions, when open questions, respectively, suppressed and enhanced client expressions of CT. Findings suggest that clinicians must remain vigilant to client CT throughout the group session, reinforcing it when it arises spontaneously and selectively employing open-ended questions to elicit it when it does not, particularly toward the end of the session.

Indexed as

Professional-Patient RelationsPsychotherapeutic ProcessesSpeechAdolescentAdolescent BehaviorFemaleHumansJuvenile DelinquencyMaleMotivational InterviewingPsychotherapy, Group

Identifiers

PMID26415055
PMCPMC4701607
OpenAlexW2407220635

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.