Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26415018›Full record

ArticleJournal of electrocardiology

Noninvasive electrocardiographic imaging of chronic myocardial infarct scar.

B Milan Horáček, Linwei Wang, Fady Dawoud, Jingjia Xu, John L Sapp

Abstract readComparative StudyEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of electrocardiology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Statistical guidance of VT ablation.Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology · 2018
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

B Milan HoráčekDalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada. Electronic address: milan.horacek@dal.ca.
Linwei WangRochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, NY, USA.
Fady DawoudDalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada.
Jingjia XuRochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, NY, USA.
John L SappDalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada.

Funding

Transmural Electrophysiological Imaging to Guide Catheter Ablation of ArrhythmiasR21HL125998 · NHLBI · ROCHESTER INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI WANG, LINWEI · 2015 to 2016
$419k
Canadian Institutes of Health ResearchNHLBI NIH HHS R21 HL125998NHLBI NIH HHS R21HL125998
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMyocardial infarction (MI) scar constitutes a substrate for ventricular tachycardia (VT), and an accurate delineation of infarct scar may help to identify reentrant circuits and thus facilitate catheter ablation. One of the recent advancements in characterization of a VT substrate is its volumetric delineation within the ventricular wall by noninvasive electrocardiographic imaging. This paper compares, in four specific cases, epicardial and volumetric inverse solutions, using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with late gadolinium enhancement as a gold standard.

methodsFor patients with chronic MI, who presented at Glasgow Western Infirmary, delayed-enhancement MRI and 120-lead body surface potential mapping (BSPM) data were acquired and 4 selected cases were later made available to a wider community as part of the 2007 PhysioNet/Computers in Cardiology Challenge. These data were used to perform patient-specific inverse solutions for epicardial electrograms and morphology-based criteria were applied to delineate infarct scar on the epicardial surface. Later, the Rochester group analyzed the same data by means of a novel inverse solution for reconstructing intramural transmembrane potentials, to delineate infarct scar in three dimensions. Comparison of the performance of three specific inverse-solution algorithms is presented here, using scores based on the 17-segment ventricular division scheme recommended by the American Heart Association.

resultsThe noninvasive methods delineating infarct scar as three-dimensional (3D) intramural distribution of transmembrane action potentials outperform estimates providing scar delineation on the epicardial surface in all scores used for comparison. In particular, the extent of infarct scar (its percentage mass relative to the total ventricular mass) is rendered more accurately by the 3D estimate. Moreover, the volumetric rendition of scar border provides better clues to potential targets for catheter ablation.

conclusionsElectrocardiographic inverse solution providing transmural distribution of ventricular action potentials is a promising tool for noninvasively delineating the extent and location of chronic MI scar. Further validation on a larger data set with detailed gold-standard data is needed to confirm observations reported in this study.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsBody Surface Potential MappingChronic DiseaseCicatrixDiagnosis, Computer-AssistedElectrocardiographyHumansImaging, Three-DimensionalMagnetic Resonance ImagingMultimodal ImagingMyocardial InfarctionReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and SpecificityElectrocardiographyInverse solutionMyocardial infarction

Identifiers

PMID26415018
PMCPMC4646064

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.