Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26414700›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurotrauma2016

Robotic Rehabilitator of the Rodent Upper Extremity: A System and Method for Assessing and Training Forelimb Force Production after Neurological Injury.

Kelli G Sharp, Jaime E Duarte, Berkenesh Gebrekristos, Sergi Perez, Oswald Steward, David J Reinkensmeyer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurotrauma, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Kelli G Sharp1 Department of Dance, University of California at Irvine , Irvine, California.
Jaime E Duarte3 Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, University of California at Irvine , Irvine, California.
Berkenesh Gebrekristos2 Reeve-Irvine Research Center, University of California at Irvine , Irvine, California.
Sergi Perez3 Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, University of California at Irvine , Irvine, California.
Oswald Steward2 Reeve-Irvine Research Center, University of California at Irvine , Irvine, California.
David J Reinkensmeyer2 Reeve-Irvine Research Center, University of California at Irvine , Irvine, California.

Funding

Towards a therapy to regenerate corticospinal axonsR01NS073857 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI STEWARD, OSWALD · 2011 to 2015
$1.7M
NINDS NIH HHS N01 NS-3-5354NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS073857
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rodent models of spinal cord injury are critical for the development of treatments for upper limb motor impairment in humans, but there are few methods for measuring forelimb strength of rodents, an important outcome measure. We developed a novel robotic device--the Robotic Rehabilitator of the Rodent Upper Extremity (RUE)--that requires rats to voluntarily reach for and pull a bar to retrieve a food reward; the resistance of the bar can be programmed. We used RUE to train forelimb strength of 16 rats three times per week for 23 weeks before and 38 weeks after a mild (100 kdyne) unilateral contusion at the cervical level 5 (C5). We measured maximum force produced when RUE movement was unexpectedly blocked. We compared this blocked pulling force (BPF) to weekly measures of forelimb strength obtained with a previous, well-established method: the grip strength meter (GSM). Before injury, BPF was 2.6 times higher (BPF, 444.6 ± 19.1 g; GSM, 168.4 ± 3.1 g) and 4.9 times more variable (p < 0.001) than pulling force measured with the GSM; the two measurement methods were uncorrelated (R(2) = 0.03; p = 0.84). After injury, there was a significant decrease in BPF of 134.35 g ± 14.71 g (p < 0.001). Together, our findings document BPF as a repeatable measure of forelimb force production, sensitive to a mild spinal cord injury, which comes closer to measuring maximum force than the GSM and thus may provide a useful measure for quantifying the effects of treatment in rodent models of SCI.

Indexed as

AnimalsCervical VertebraeFemaleForelimbMovementRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyRoboticsSpinal Cord Injuriesgrip strengthmotor learningmotor systemratrecovery of functionrehabilitationroboticsspinal cord injury

Identifiers

PMID26414700
PMCPMC4779318

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.